Re: broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:30:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Where is it used (aka "#include"d)? > > It seems that we haven't had any autoconf code for it for quite some > time. Don't forget to change configure.ac too :) I was

Re: broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:57:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > But I guess simly removing 'memmove' somewhere should suffice? ?? I just meant the mention of BROKEN_HEADERS in AH_BOTTOM. > > > So any objection against a 'cvs remove'? > > ? remove it john -- Khendon's Law: If the same poin

broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
What are broken_headers.h and tracer.[Ch] good for? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Re: broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Where is it used (aka "#include"d)? It seems that we haven't had any autoconf code for it for quite some time. Don't forget to change configure.ac too :) > So any objection against a 'cvs remove'? Certainly john -- Khendon's La

Re: broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
used (aka "#include"d)? > > tracer.[Ch] > > I doubt anybody has used it for years. Don't forget the commented out > include So any objection against a 'cvs remove'? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will

Re: broken_headers.h tracer.[Ch]

2003-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:11:12AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > broken_headers.h Self-documenting. I doubt it applies to any reasonable Sun system today, and we (obviously) do not care > tracer.[Ch] I doubt anybody has used it for years. Don't forget the commented out inclu

Re: tracer.[Ch]

2002-06-12 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:43:19PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > What's it for? Some silly debugging tool. > We don't use it anyway; can I nuke it? I hope so, I have been meaning to ask this for about 18 months :) > Makefile.am:41: tracer.h > Makefile.in:259:tracer.h > tracer.C:19:#in

tracer.[Ch]

2002-06-12 Thread Angus Leeming
What's it for? We don't use it anyway; can I nuke it? Angus aleem@pneumon:src-> grep -n tracer.h * */* */*/* */*/*/* Makefile.am:41: tracer.h Makefile.in:259:tracer.h tracer.C:19:#include "tracer.h" CVS/Entries:80:/tracer.h/1.9/Thu Mar 21 18:11:10 2002//