On 14-Dec-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well thanks for commiting this and nowing that I did big changes in
>| that file
>
> Why every would be changes be needed in that file? It is a container,
> no policy should be in it.
Well I didn't touch undostack only undo_funcs.C and the big chang
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:18:54AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> - Undo * undo = bv->buffer()->undostack.pop();
> + Undo * undo = bv->buffer()->undostack.top();
> + bv->buffer()->undostack.pop();
>
> Why is this better?
This is better because it makes the interface of the UndoS
On 13-Dec-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> It serves only as a measure to remove distraction ("Gosh... why two spaces
> here") when reading undostack.C...
Well thanks for commiting this and nowing that I did big changes in that file
so that I loose more time resolving conflicts the fixing bugs! Some
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:20:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Juergen, can I apply this? You say your are looking at undo.
Andre> Too late ;-)
I saw that :)
JMarc
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:20:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen, can I apply this? You say your are looking at undo.
Too late ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> This is (more or less) part of the somewhat larger undo patch I
Andre> send some time ago.
Andre> It's not only whitespace stuff, making 'pop' more STL like, and
Andre> removal of some spurious 'using lyx::pos_type'
Andre> It ser
This is (more or less) part of the somewhat larger undo patch I send some
time ago.
It's not only whitespace stuff, making 'pop' more STL like, and removal of
some spurious 'using lyx::pos_type'
It serves only as a measure to remove distraction ("Gosh... why two spaces
here") when reading undos
