Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> If you think that
> Not overwriting existing file /tmp/tex2lyx_depend/chapters/intro.lyx
> is enough, remove what I added, but as I was misleaded by the message
> (I thought that an user might want to keep a previous
> satisfactory conversion result), others may be al
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
I see that in the new Wiki page
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/Tex2LyxInvokedFromLyx
there is no provision to deal with multipart (La)TeX docs.
When is 1.3.6 planned ?
If it's coming very soon, it's not worth doing scripting for backconversion.
I'd say that it was coming
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This will hopefully not be necessary anymore with 1.3.6, because we plan to
> make it read newer files with automatic conversion.
I see that in the new Wiki page
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/Tex2LyxInvokedFromLyx
there is no provision to deal with multipart
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> > I'd uploaded a sunos version on the wiki including these changes,
> > without waiting for Georg to commit them if he founds appropriate,
>
> Thanks. I simplified the logic a bit and committed the attached patch. BTW,
>
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I'd uploaded a sunos version on the wiki including these changes,
> without waiting for Georg to commit them if he founds appropriate,
Thanks. I simplified the logic a bit and committed the attached patch. BTW,
please use unified diffs (diff -u) the next time, it is
Jean-Pierre Chrétien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is my suggestion:
> - enumerate absolute path of \included ou \inputted files converted to lyx
> (with indication of creation or overwrite).
> - warn about inset of original .tex file if existing lyx file (this may be
> very misleading).
I
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> This is intended behaviour. After all, we don't know if an already
> existing .lyx file has anything to do with the .tex file. LaTeX would use
> the .tex file, so tex2lyx uses it, too.
I see.
> In general, some informa
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> So it turns out that the suffix substitution does not happen
> if the included lyx file already exists.
The suffix substituion does happen (but intro -> intro.tex, not intro ->
intro.lyx)
> I don't know if this is the nominal behaviour, but in this case
> I can't us
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2005 19:40 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
>
> > Recompilation from cvs works fine now, but I still get
> \include{intro.tex}
>
> I can't reproduce that, it works for me. I guess from your earlier posts
> that you are using tex2lyx
Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2005 19:40 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
> Recompilation from cvs works fine now, but I still get
\include{intro.tex}
I can't reproduce that, it works for me. I guess from your earlier posts
that you are using tex2lyx on solaris? You could run tex2lyx in the
debugger and/o
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
>
>
> Probably because I mixed up the return values of main().
>
> I applied the patch with a corrected return value of main(). Does it work
> now?
Recompilation from cvs works fine now, but I still get \include{intro.te
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I get this:
> Converting main.tex and dependant files to lyx format 241...
> Ignoring options 'T1' of package fontenc.
> Exiting...
>
> and there is no mail.lyx file created.
Probably because I mixed up the return values of main().
I applied the patch with a correc
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> It is fixed by the attached patch. Can you try that please? I could not
> reproduce any other problem than the relative path. If there are still
> problems after applying the patch, could you describe them again?
I get
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> This is not enough, tex2lyx still keeps \include{subdir/file.tex}
> instead of \include{subdir/file.lyx} in the master document.
I could not reproduce that with your examples.
> code.lyx in turn sets a \verbatiminput{../tex2lyx.sh}
> tex2lyx.sh is located in the sam
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> > I discovered that tex2lyx kept \include{foo.tex} in the lyx file
> > instead of \include{foo.lyx}
> > (the original command in the latex file must be \include{foo}, and
> > the export to LaTeX correctly removes the suff
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I discovered that tex2lyx kept \include{foo.tex} in the lyx file
> instead of \include{foo.lyx}
> (the original command in the latex file must be \include{foo}, and
> the export to LaTeX correctly removes the suffix).
This is fixed now. The problem was that tex2lyx d
Hello,
While testing an improvement of the tex wrapper tex2lyx.sh
uploaded in the latex2lyx wiki page
http://wiki.lyx.org/LaTeX/LatexToLyx
I discovered that tex2lyx kept \include{foo.tex} in the lyx file
instead of \include{foo.lyx}
(the original command in the latex file must be \include{foo}, an
17 matches
Mail list logo
