Re: still wrong mathed

2002-01-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:01:51PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > > >>this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but > >> > >>drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript). > > > > Huh? Works

Re: still wrong mathed

2002-01-22 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > >>this is still buggy: \_test is exported well into latex, but >> >>drawn wrong in mathed (as subscript). > Huh? Works for me. Try the attached test. > created by M-m S-underscore t e s t in mathed

Re: still wrong mathed

2002-01-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:36:52AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > > Improved patch. > > > > + Renders OK on-screen and in print, saves and loads OK > > + Key sequences M-m ^ and M-m _ now work (hey, *almost* good enough :-) > > - Still based on \hat. Horizontal positioning in screen rendering ma

still wrong mathed

2002-01-21 Thread Herbert Voss
Martin Vermeer wrote: >>What is also still undone is to make the key sequences \_ and \^ do the >>right thing. > Improved patch. > > + Renders OK on-screen and in print, saves and loads OK > + Key sequences M-m ^ and M-m _ now work (hey, *almost* good enough :-) > - Still based on \hat. Hori