Re: 1.1.5pre1 (was: spellchecker.C and the LGPL)

2000-04-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Please leave in the addition of the FAQ and TOC to the Help menu Mike> if it isn't too offensive. Everything else can be nuked until it Mike> is redone properly. I left them in. JMarc

Re: 1.1.5pre1 (was: spellchecker.C and the LGPL)

2000-04-26 Thread mressler
On 26 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Something that should be sorted out (especially if we ask translators > to update po-files) is the half-baked patch from Mike that I applied > for menus (which changes Figure to Graphic). It should either be > reversed or be done properly (i.e. change

Re: 1.1.5pre1 (was: spellchecker.C and the LGPL)

2000-04-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Lars> After you have done that, and I have commited my changes Lars> (I got | Lars> a bit bored again...) I will release 1.1.5pre1, Lars> later today. | | Something that

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> I've discovered why the spellchecking in LyX is so slow: after Dekel> each word is spellchecked, LyX calls to fl_check_forms() to Dekel> check if the user has pressed the stop/close button. These Dekel> calls makes the spellchecking s

Re: 1.1.5pre1 (was: spellchecker.C and the LGPL)

2000-04-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> After you have done that, and I have commited my changes (I got | Lars> a bit bored again...) I will release 1.1.5pre1, later today. | | Something that should be sorted out (especially if we ask translators | to update po-files) is the hal

1.1.5pre1 (was: spellchecker.C and the LGPL)

2000-04-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> After you have done that, and I have commited my changes (I got Lars> a bit bored again...) I will release 1.1.5pre1, later today. Something that should be sorted out (especially if we ask translators to update po-files) is th

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I am ready to commit it, unless you have objections. none. | Similarly, I plan to commit Andre's import-factoring patch (modulo a | bug fix). I am not sure about the other, though. Apply both of them. After you have done that, and I have comm

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Similarly, I plan to commit Andre's import-factoring patch (modulo a > bug fix). I am not sure about the other, though. Leave the second out then. I'd rather have the 'automagic' version that uses 'import' on files ending on anything else than .lyx anyway ;-) OTOH: I think the change in logic

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I've discovered why Lars> the spellchecking in LyX is so slow: after each word is | Lars> spellchecked, LyX calls to fl_check_forms() to check if the user Lars> has pressed | the stop/cl

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I've discovered why the spellchecking in LyX is so slow: after each word is | spellchecked, LyX calls to fl_check_forms() to check if the user has pressed | the stop/close button. These calls makes the spellchecking so slow. | I've created a patch that cal

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-25 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 10:52:24AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I thought KLyX was using KSpell (KDE spellcheck class), but an > inspection of the code showed that this is not the case. Inspecting > the differences in code source may be useful, then. > I've discovered why the spellchecki

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> I mentioned this some time ago, and I was comparing LyX with Dekel> *KLyX* (i.e., the spell checking in KLyX is much faster). I thought KLyX was using KSpell (KDE spellcheck class), but an inspection of the code showed that this is n

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-17 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:34:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Kevin" == Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would not see any obstacle to this myself, but then I am not the > author of the code... However, it has been said earlier that LyX spell > checker was much sl

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-17 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> Kevin> Would it be possible to release the ispell specific parts of > Kevin> spellchecker.C under the LGPL. Since it doesn't look like any > Kevin> of the LyX developers have the time, I decided to create the > Kevin> ispell module myself. Since I know very little about working > Kevin> with a p

Re: spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kevin" == Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> Would it be possible to release the ispell specific parts of Kevin> spellchecker.C under the LGPL. Since it doesn't look like any Kevin> of the LyX developers have the time, I decided to create the Kevin> ispell module myself. Sin

spellchecker.C and the LGPL

2000-04-14 Thread Kevin Atkinson
Would it be possible to release the ispell specific parts of spellchecker.C under the LGPL. Since it doesn't look like any of the LyX developers have the time, I decided to create the ispell module myself. Since I know very little about working with a pipe I thought I would use the ispell specif