On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:23:03AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> I agree. (even if I'm not sure we are lying, just that the
> meaning of the scrollbar is different)
Hey, the Mac got away with it for years, so I suppose we'll survive :)
regards
john
John Levon wrote:
> Paragraph granularity is the best option I think. I don't have an
Fine.
> opinion on the other question since I don't understand it (I ihaven't
> spent the time to ...).
When the above is done well (which is not exactly the case in CVS), we have
a mathematical increasing fun
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John L., I'm particularly interested in yours since you're the one who
> better understand gui issues and you also seemed to be the most critic wrt.
> the coord scheme change.
Paragraph granularity is the best option I think. I
As a consequence of the fact that we currently never rebreak the full
document, we ignore its vertical size in pixels. To implement a working
scrollbar this is a bit of nuissance.
One possibility (the most reasonable IMO) is to measure the size of the
document in paragraphs (and fractions of a par
