Re: scex/idex...

2002-11-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 26 November 2002 8:31 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Is there any reason why we need these #defines? Why not just rename | > | flyx_shortcut_extract as scex and flyx_ident_extract as idex and

Re: scex/idex...

2002-11-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 8:31 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Is there any reason why we need these #defines? Why not just rename > | flyx_shortcut_extract as scex and flyx_ident_extract as idex and be > | done with it? > > Is nothing sacred to you?

Re: scex/idex...

2002-11-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Is there any reason why we need these #defines? Why not just rename | flyx_shortcut_extract as scex and flyx_ident_extract as idex and be | done with it? Is nothing sacred to you? -- Lgb

scex/idex...

2002-11-26 Thread Angus Leeming
Is there any reason why we need these #defines? Why not just rename flyx_shortcut_extract as scex and flyx_ident_extract as idex and be done with it? Angus #ifndef FORMS_GETTEXT_H #define FORMS_GETTEXT_H /// Extract shortcut from | string char const * flyx_shortcut_extract(char const * sc); //