On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:55:26PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Jean-Marc had the same idea.
>
> Excellent. Now the fun can begin, I guess :-)
>
> BTW feel free to backport fixes to the new branch while you are sober.
> Just put them in if you are confident enough (
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Jean-Marc had the same idea.
Excellent. Now the fun can begin, I guess :-)
BTW feel free to backport fixes to the new branch while you are sober. Just
put them in if you are confident enough (this only applies for the meeting, of
course).
Jürgen
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:40:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Unless someone complains very loudly soon I'll change the naming of
> > our generated moc files to the "more standard" moc_*.cpp scheme.
> > Makes interaction with one of the tools I'd like to use simpler
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Unless someone complains very loudly soon I'll change the naming of
> our generated moc files to the "more standard" moc_*.cpp scheme.
> Makes interaction with one of the tools I'd like to use simpler.
But please remember to create an 1_6_X branch before breaking trunk into
Unless someone complains very loudly soon I'll change the naming of
our generated moc files to the "more standard" moc_*.cpp scheme.
Makes interaction with one of the tools I'd like to use simpler.
Andre'
