> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: It's broken for me because you don't include lib jpeg in
John> the libs when testing flimage, so the link fails. Obviously you
John> can't just include it uncon
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> It's broken for me because you don't include lib jpeg in the
> John> libs when testing flimage, so the link fails. Obviously you
> John> can't just include it unconditionally, because that will break
> John> the link fo
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This new version is simpler
John> Probably because it's incomplete :)
OK, I think it is even shorter now. Care to try it out?
JMarc
On Friday 07 June 2002 11:17 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 07-Jun-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > What are the versions of xforms that are linked against -ljpeg?
> > Actually, I use the static version of 0. here. Is the latest rc4
> > still linked against -jpeg? This is an xforms bug IMO
On 07-Jun-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What are the versions of xforms that are linked against -ljpeg?
> Actually, I use the static version of 0. here. Is the latest rc4
> still linked against -jpeg? This is an xforms bug IMO and if it
> appears that it is fixed in 1.0 I do not want to
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> People, I have rewritten most of xforms.m4 in the 1.2.1cvs branch.
John> Well I tried to warn you ...
Don't worry for me.
John> It's broken for me because
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:56:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> People, I have rewritten most of xforms.m4 in the 1.2.1cvs branch.
Well I tried to warn you ...
It's broken for me because you don't include lib jpeg in the libs when
testing flimage, so the link fails. Obviously you can't
People, I have rewritten most of xforms.m4 in the 1.2.1cvs branch.
This new version is simpler and should work better than what we had.
Yes, I know that it changes config.h and you will have to recompile
everything (I suspect it is not the last time). I am sure there are
bugs in this code, but I
