Re: replace boost::utility with homemade equivalent

2007-09-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
Just for the record. Current sizes of translation units: Total: 24630751 lines 4 ../../development/cmake/src/dummy.cpp 4 ../../src/insets/InsetTheorem.cpp 15 ../../src/version.cpp 82 ../../src/Dimension.cpp 1585 ../../src/frontends/controllers/tests/b

Re: replace boost::utility with homemade equivalent

2007-09-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 08:41:24PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > Good idea, it will hopefully save some compile time. > I tried the patch, and unfortunately got: I somehow managed to build an incomplete patch. Something different is commited now. Thanks for testing. Andre'

Re: replace boost::utility with homemade equivalent

2007-09-30 Thread Helge Hafting
Andre Poenitz wrote: I want to get rid of those parts of boost that have an exceptionally bad overhead. Patch to replace boost::noncopyable with a homemade version attached. This is to avoid a discussion on the "expressiveness" of #include "something" class Foo : NonCopiabl

Re: replace boost::utility with homemade equivalent

2007-09-30 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: I want to get rid of those parts of boost that have an exceptionally bad overhead. Patch to replace boost::noncopyable with a homemade version attached. If you're confident about the code, I don't myself see any loss---except the 30,000 lines of code. rh This is to av

replace boost::utility with homemade equivalent

2007-09-30 Thread Andre Poenitz
I want to get rid of those parts of boost that have an exceptionally bad overhead. Patch to replace boost::noncopyable with a homemade version attached. This is to avoid a discussion on the "expressiveness" of #include "something" class Foo : NonCopiable { ...