Re: relaxed requirements on std::string

2000-07-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | What is your recommendation regarding LyX RPMs? Should I generated | them --with-included-string? That's my inclination, considering the | 800K bloat. Just use --with-included-string ... unless you want to create gtk rpm's :-) Lgb

Re: relaxed requirements on std::string

2000-07-24 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I have reduced LyX' requirements on std::string so that we are now > able to compile with the std::string distributed with egcs and gcc > 2.95.x. LyX will use this by default. If you want to use the lyxstring > you have to u

relaxed requirements on std::string

2000-07-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I have reduced LyX' requirements on std::string so that we are now able to compile with the std::string distributed with egcs and gcc 2.95.x. LyX will use this by default. If you want to use the lyxstring you have to use --with-included-string. One "bad" thing about the std::string in gcc is tha