Re: rebuild of the patch that tries to reduces re-compile times

2001-11-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:05:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > (and "POD const v" in a argument list is always a bug) It certainly is a pain for no good reason in the .h. I have seen coding guidelines requiring in the .C, though. Not that I am very fond of it... Actually I can live with

Re: rebuild of the patch that tries to reduces re-compile times

2001-11-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:04:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | What about applying the patch first and do the political bits later? > > because it is nearly impossible to make people do thing later. The > best time to fix a patch really well, it before it is applied. Invalid generaliza

Re: rebuild of the patch that tries to reduces re-compile times

2001-11-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Ok, mostly happy with it. > The only thing that bothers me a bit now is that we have: > > BufferView::pos_type > LyXText::pos_type > LyXRow::pos_type > Paragraph::pos_type > > etc. > > can't we do with just lyx::pos_type

Re: rebuild of the patch that tries to reduces re-compile times

2001-11-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> It compiles again but I am notoriously bad at fixing merging Andre> conflicts. Andre> Please apply the uncontroversial parts. I applied the parts which are not related to Paragraph::pos_type. Unfortunately, this is on 10% of the

rebuild of the patch that tries to reduces re-compile times

2001-11-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
It compiles again but I am notoriously bad at fixing merging conflicts. Please apply the uncontroversial parts. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] src3.diff.gz Description: application/gunzip