Am Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 11:18 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> As an aside to the rest of the developers: adding stuff like this leads
> to a bastardisation of the lyx format output by reLyX. Most of it is
> still lyxformat 215 with occasional sprinklings of later formats. Will
> this confuse lyx2lyx
José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>> As an aside to the rest of the developers: adding stuff like this leads
>> to a bastardisation of the lyx format output by reLyX. Most of it is
>> still lyxformat 215 with occasional sprinklings of later formats.
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 10:18, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> As an aside to the rest of the developers: adding stuff like this leads to
> a bastardisation of the lyx format output by reLyX. Most of it is still
> lyxformat 215 with occasional sprinklings of later formats. Will this
> confuse lyx2ly
Georg Baum wrote:
Hello, Georg.
> is there any particular reason that reLyX does not
> recognize minipages?
The only that development of reLyX has stalled since Amir Karger moved on.
No one else appears to have the stomach for perl.
> I had to convert a document that contained a lot of them,
Hi,
is there any particular reason that reLyX does not
recognize minipages? I had to convert a document
that contained a lot of them, and so I added support
for minipages to BasicLyX.pm.
I don't know if this is the "correct way" to do it,
but it works for me and might be useful for others.
Georg
