Le 10/03/11 20:45, José Matos a écrit :
Your patch works here and I agree that it is nicer then the one it is now. :-)
Happy? :-)
Yes, but what's the catch?
JMarc
On Thursday 10 March 2011 17:55:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What a diplomatic way to tell me that I again forgot about the most
> important part :)
Diplomat is my middle name. ;-)
Your patch works here and I agree that it is nicer then the one it is now. :-)
Happy? :-)
> OK, here is it no
Le 10/03/2011 13:50, José Matos a écrit :
FWIW at the time that I read your message it looked like you forgot to attach
the patch. So in the original thread I only saw Stephan's patch and not yours.
What a diplomatic way to tell me that I again forgot about the most
important part :)
OK, her
On Thursday 10 March 2011 09:36:02 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Yes, this one I've posted and tested. Why do you ask?
>
> I still think that mine is a useful cleanup, although functionally
> equivalent. I thought this was the one José tested.
>
> JMarc
Actually I tested Stephan's.
FWIW at th
Le 09/03/2011 19:18, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Am 09.03.2011 um 18:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 09/03/2011 16:40, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
Author: switt
Date: Wed Mar 9 16:40:03 2011
New Revision: 37887
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37887
Log:
do not check for hunspell libraries
Am 09.03.2011 um 18:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 09/03/2011 16:40, sw...@lyx.org a écrit :
>> Author: switt
>> Date: Wed Mar 9 16:40:03 2011
>> New Revision: 37887
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37887
>>
>> Log:
>> do not check for hunspell libraries if header is not present
