Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Kornel wrote:
> > > reasoning behind my proposal is that its much easier to work with plain
> > > .lyx files and to review what actually being set manually, ie non
> > > defaults. its useful for people who write scritps around or do some
> > > rev
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> we dont have any definitive policy about this, some prefs are written
> explicitely, some not. my proposal would be to make explicit dump of
> only those, which have some probability to chnage its defaults in future
> versions...
>
> i have actually more candidates in 2.0 head
Kornel wrote:
> > reasoning behind my proposal is that its much easier to work with plain
> > .lyx files and to review what actually being set manually, ie non defaults.
> > its useful for people who write scritps around or do some revision control
> > on .lyx material.
> >
> > we dont have any de
Am Sonntag, 20. Februar 2011 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > +\language_package default
> > >
> > > what about output this inly when nondefault is used?
> >
> > No strict opinion, but I prefer to have everything explicitly defined.
>
> reasoning be
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > +\language_package default
> >
> > what about output this inly when nondefault is used?
>
> No strict opinion, but I prefer to have everything explicitly defined.
reasoning behind my proposal is that its much easier to work with plain
.lyx fil
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > +\language_package default
>
> what about output this inly when nondefault is used?
No strict opinion, but I prefer to have everything explicitly defined.
Jürgen
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Sun Feb 20 13:46:33 2011
> New Revision: 37741
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37741
>
> Log:
> * Additional.lyx
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx
>
> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/lib/doc/Additional.lyx
>
