Le 12 avr. 10 à 21:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Richard Heck wrote:
We should perhaps add this to our bug reporting comments: If you
are seeing
the bug in checkouts from svn, then you might want to try a fresh
checkout.
already done in FAQ :)
But this should not happen...
JMarc
Richard Heck wrote:
> We should perhaps add this to our bug reporting comments: If you are seeing
> the bug in checkouts from svn, then you might want to try a fresh checkout.
already done in FAQ :)
p
On 04/12/2010 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
ehh, i thought from the one without argument, no?
FuncRequest? (this=0x8c0111c, act=lyx::LFUN_UNKNOWN_ACTION,
o=lyx::FuncRequest::INTERNAL) at FuncRequest?.cpp:39
Please read further:
#11 0x081a00c8 in
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >ehh, i thought from the one without argument, no?
> >
> >FuncRequest? (this=0x8c0111c, act=lyx::LFUN_UNKNOWN_ACTION,
> >o=lyx::FuncRequest::INTERNAL) at FuncRequest?.cpp:39
>
> Please read further:
>
> #11 0x081a00c8 in static_initialization_and_destructio
>ehh, i thought from the one without argument, no?
>
>FuncRequest? (this=0x8c0111c, act=lyx::LFUN_UNKNOWN_ACTION,
>o=lyx::FuncRequest::INTERNAL) at FuncRequest?.cpp:39
Please read further:
#11 0x081a00c8 in static_initialization_and_destruction_0 ()
at FuncRequest?.cpp:28
This is your 0 initia
Richard Heck wrote:
> I've tried restoring the initialization order. Otherwise, yes, it is VERY
> strange. Note that this comes from LyX.cpp:531:
> lyx::dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_WINDOW_NEW, geometryArg));
> So the constructor was actually this one:
> FuncRequest::FuncRequest(FuncCode act,
On 04/12/2010 11:31 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
- : action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0), y_(0),
+ : argument_(0), action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0),
y_(0),
What's the rationale about initializing a docstring wit
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >-: action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0), y_(0),
> >+: argument_(0), action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0),
> y_(0),
> >
>
> What's the rationale about initializing a docstring with 0 ? (Does it
> even compile ?)
hrmpf, i only wanted to add s
>- : action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0), y_(0),
>+ : argument_(0), action_(LFUN_NOACTION), origin_(o), x_(0),
y_(0),
>
What's the rationale about initializing a docstring with 0 ? (Does it
even compile ?)
Vincent
