Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-24 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > i was right http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31376 > sorry cut and paste error http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32604 >>> I couldn't find the cut and paste error in my commit >>> >> >> cut and paste error in my message, because i

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-24 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
i was right http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31376 sorry cut and paste error http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32604 I couldn't find the cut and paste error in my commit cut and paste error in my message, because its not your commit at all, see the second one ;) i must

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-24 Thread Pavel Sanda
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Pavel Sanda wrote: > >>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. > > pavel > > > Is it the same problem as this: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-24 Thread Peter Kümmel
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. > pavel > Is it the same problem as this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158 >>> i have suspiction tha

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-24 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > > > >> no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. > > >> pavel > > >> > > > Is it the same problem as this: > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158 > > > > i have suspiction that move

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > >> no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. > >> pavel > >> > > Is it the same problem as this: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158 > > i have suspiction that movement of VC_ lfuns into GuiView is respo

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. >> pavel >> > Is it the same problem as this: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158 i have suspiction that movement of VC_ lfuns into GuiView is responsible here. all messages are cleare

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
no luck. it might be older problem, i'll have a look. pavel Is it the same problem as this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/123158 ? Vincent

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Peter, it looks statusbar is somewhat damaged now. > > previously some LFUNs displayed results through statusbar > > which is no more true. i only see timestamp(dow we need it?) +name of > > completed > > LFUN. for example when we have checked from svn

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Peter Kümmel
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Peter, it looks statusbar is somewhat damaged now. > previously some LFUNs displayed results through statusbar > which is no more true. i only see timestamp(dow we need it?) +name of > completed > LFUN. for example when we have checked from svn tree, one could see on status >

Re: r32604 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/ui src/frontends/qt4 src/support

2009-12-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
kuem...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: kuemmel > Date: Mon Dec 21 12:48:19 2009 > New Revision: 32604 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32604 > > Log: > Show progress information in status bar. > Remove progress view because ATM we don't have to show anything usefull. > move Alert:: void function