Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Are you sure this is still the case? The idea is that GuiView will always
> use the document Buffer even when called from the search pane. Please
> verify.
aha! :) you are right.
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
if i do eg vc-update i will close and open the buffer again, so the old
buffer/view is no more existing.
In this case we close the buffer so that should stay in GuiView. We indeed
need to do apply this LFUN to the document buffer only. B
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> if i do eg vc-update i will close and open the buffer again, so the old
>> buffer/view is no more existing.
>>
>
> In this case we close the buffer so that should stay in GuiView. We indeed
> need to do apply this LFUN to the document buffer only. But GuiView knows
On 04/10/2009 23:44, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
LyXAction::NoInternal))
+ return false;
+
switch (cmd.action) {
Abdel, why is this not done also in guiview?
Because all Buffer related LFUNs should either be in Buffer or in
BufferVi
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> LyXAction::NoInternal))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> switch (cmd.action) {
>>>
>>
>> Abdel, why is this not done also in guiview?
>>
>
> Because all Buffer related LFUNs should either be in Buffer or in
> BufferView... But maybe there are still
On 04/10/2009 13:15, Pavel Sanda wrote:
you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Sep 21 14:36:22 2009
New Revision: 31433
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31433
Log:
Introduce a new LyXAction property 'NoInternal' to take care of LFUNs that
should not be applied to internal Buf
you...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Mon Sep 21 14:36:22 2009
> New Revision: 31433
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31433
>
> Log:
> Introduce a new LyXAction property 'NoInternal' to take care of LFUNs that
> should not be applied to internal Buffers and use that in BufferView
