On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:53:45PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > This seems
> > harmless on both Linux and native Windows but causes a crash on Cygwin.
> >
>
> The difference might be that cygwin reset the memory to zero once the
> object is deleted. I know th
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:04:15PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
rgheck
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:04:15PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> rgheck wrote:
> >>>
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
rgheck wrote:
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
Ne
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
I didn't look, so maybe the answer is no, but is there some way this
could be done in one centralized location? It seems bad if we have
to have this same code in several places. But maybe there are only
some LFUNs for which it is needed?
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
rgheck wrote:
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
Ne
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > rgheck wrote:
> > > On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
> > >> Author: younes
> > >> Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
> > >> New Revision: 31419
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> rgheck wrote:
> > On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
> >> Author: younes
> >> Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
> >> New Revision: 31419
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31419
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> Try to dispatc
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
>> I didn't look, so maybe the answer is no, but is there some way this
>> could be done in one centralized location? It seems bad if we have
>> to have this same code in several places. But maybe there are only
>> some LFUNs for which it is needed?
>
> Yes, this is only
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
rgheck wrote:
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
New Revision: 31419
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31419
Log:
Try to dispatch to document BufferView in case dispatch to current
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
rgheck wrote:
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
New Revision: 31419
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31419
Log:
Try to dispatch to document BufferView in case dispatch to current
BufferView fails. This is
rgheck wrote:
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
New Revision: 31419
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31419
Log:
Try to dispatch to document BufferView in case dispatch to current
BufferView fails. This is needed for the LFUNs intr
On 09/20/2009 05:41 PM, you...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Sun Sep 20 23:41:21 2009
New Revision: 31419
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31419
Log:
Try to dispatch to document BufferView in case dispatch to current BufferView
fails. This is needed for the LFUNs introduced in r3141
13 matches
Mail list logo