Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> You were just describing the master/child concept.
Indeed. And that hidden buffers are crucial for this concept (not its current
UI implementation, but the concept).
Jürgen
Am Sonntag 09 August 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> but then the
> >>> hidden buffers will be closed automatically if the master is closed.
> >>
> >> but i dont see this. all hidden remain opened after closing master.
> >
> > If you don't see this, it's a bug. At least t
but i dont see this. all hidden remain opened after closing master.
I see it too, so this is another bug.
ok, but please note that this bug should be closed when we actually have
fixed the problem which is - to rephrase - "using master with many childs
cant be closed easily". cant rememeb
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> but then the
>>> hidden buffers will be closed automatically if the master is closed.
>>>
>>
>> but i dont see this. all hidden remain opened after closing master.
>>
>
> If you don't see this, it's a bug. At least that how I implemented it a few
> years back
On 09/08/2009 15:52, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
As I stated in another bug, I really don't get the concept of working with
hidden buffers.
The only thing I can imagine is if you have master and childs,
yes thats my usecase
but then the
hidden buffers will
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> As I stated in another bug, I really don't get the concept of working with
> hidden buffers.
>
> The only thing I can imagine is if you have master and childs,
yes thats my usecase
>but then the
> hidden buffers will be closed automatically if the master is close
As I stated in another bug, I really don't get the concept of working
with hidden buffers.
My explanations did not help?
No. You were just describing the master/child concept. Or is the
"multi-part document" different from this ?
Also if the master is hidden?
(since my master ba
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > As I stated in another bug, I really don't get the concept of working
> > with hidden buffers.
My explanations did not help?
> > The only thing I can imagine is if you have master and childs, but
> > then the hidden buffers will be closed automatically if the mas
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Pavel Sanda schreef:
v...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: vfr
Date: Fri Aug 7 01:17:16 2009
New Revision: 30882
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30882
Log:
Fix bug #740: Wish for added menu item: File->Close all.
Vincent, all hidden buffer won't get close
Pavel Sanda schreef:
v...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: vfr
Date: Fri Aug 7 01:17:16 2009
New Revision: 30882
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30882
Log:
Fix bug #740: Wish for added menu item: File->Close all.
Vincent, all hidden buffer won't get closed ?
the original report says the
v...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: vfr
> Date: Fri Aug 7 01:17:16 2009
> New Revision: 30882
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30882
>
> Log:
> Fix bug #740: Wish for added menu item: File->Close all.
Vincent, all hidden buffer won't get closed ?
the original report says the usage (which is id
11 matches
Mail list logo
