On Monday 08 May 2006 14:49, Bo Peng wrote:
> I am being blamed for a completely parallel patch, and you ask me to
> propose a major renaming just for "your precious scons"? No way.
Do you really think that only reason for changing the suffix is scons? :-)
> Anyway, if that will ever happen,
On 5/8/06, John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:15:27AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> The only serious patch I need to do with qt4.py is actually related to
> the .C extension we use. It is not considered as a C++ extension
> there. Also, under windows, since windows is not
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 08:15:27AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> The only serious patch I need to do with qt4.py is actually related to
> the .C extension we use. It is not considered as a C++ extension
> there. Also, under windows, since windows is not case sensitive, the
> .C files are considered as .
On Monday 08 May 2006 14:15, Bo Peng wrote:
> The only serious patch I need to do with qt4.py is actually related to
> the .C extension we use. It is not considered as a C++ extension
> there. Also, under windows, since windows is not case sensitive, the
> .C files are considered as .c and gcc is u
| * qt4.py: qt4 support is not yet official, and I have to patch this file
This commit was way premature!
I hate it already, without even having had a look at it.
You mean without qt4 support? You know what is qt support? With them,
I need only to write
qt4 = qtenv.StaticLibrary(
targe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added:
> lyx-devel/trunk/qt4.py
> lyx-devel/trunk/scons_utils.py
Do these need to live here? IMO they should go to config.
Georg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: bpeng
| Date: Mon May 8 00:44:54 2006
| New Revision: 13807
|
| Log:
| scons-based build system, by Bo Peng ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
| * SConstruct: main SConstruct file
| * scons_utils.py: utility functions
| * qt4.py: qt4 support is not yet off
