> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 09-Mar-2001 John Levon wrote:
>> I have that separated in the matrix ... from my quick look, the
>> "options" dialog, however is a duplicate of the prefs one.
Juergen> No but we could have a button "Global Options" which op
On 09-Mar-2001 John Levon wrote:
> I have that separated in the matrix ... from my quick look, the "options" dialog,
> however is a duplicate of the prefs one.
No but we could have a button "Global Options" which opens the right tab
in the preferences dialog, so to minimize User-interaction, co
On 09-Mar-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
> And should we allow document specific spell chekcer options?
> If so then some of the SpellCheckerOptions form should be implemented as a
> tab folder of FormDocument.
>
> Anyway I think we need to decide just what scope spell checker options
> should have:
>
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Anyway I think we need to decide just what scope spell checker options
> > should have:
>
> > Documentmaybe?
> > Per-spellcheck run ???
>
> I would suggest if we *do* want these, they can be done
> I'll add you as pending for spellchecker
> and remove SpellcheckerOptions as
> you are going to kill it (right ?)
Yes. Thanks, Ed.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> If you need a volunteer, you got one :). I can do both the options and the
> spellcheck window itself (the weekend is coming up for a start).
>
> gr.ed.
I'll add you as pending for spellchecker and remove SpellcheckerOptions as you
are going to kill it
If you need a volunteer, you got one :). I can do both the options and the
spellcheck window itself (the weekend is coming up for a start).
gr.ed.
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> Anyway I think we need to decide just what scope spell checker options
> should have:
> Documentmaybe?
> Per-spellcheck run ???
I would suggest if we *do* want these, they can be done later. So for now
a simple quashing of
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 08-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Edwin> So what is left to be moved? The spellchecker? In the matrix
> > Edwin> the spellchecker options are marked "obsolete?" Whats the catch
> > Edwin> here?
> >
> > I think they can be set from Pre
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 08-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Edwin> So what is left to be moved? The spellchecker? In the matrix
> > Edwin> the spellchecker options are marked "obsolete?" Whats the catch
> > Edwin> here?
> >
> > I think they can be set from Prefer
On 08-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Edwin> So what is left to be moved? The spellchecker? In the matrix
> Edwin> the spellchecker options are marked "obsolete?" Whats the catch
> Edwin> here?
>
> I think they can be set from Preferences.
The global settings maybe, but we still need th
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think you should spend time to move this to GUII!
Edwin> ok.
Edwin> So what is left to be moved? The spellchecker? In the matrix
Edwin> the spellchecker options are marked "obsolete?" Whats the catch
Edwin> here?
I think they
> I don't think you should spend time to move this to GUII!
ok.
So what is left to be moved? The spellchecker? In the matrix the spellchecker
options are marked "obsolete?" Whats the catch here?
Thanks, Ed.
On 08-Mar-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> ...in forms/form1.fd (and src/form1.[Ch]) is a "figure" dialog which appears
> to be already in frontends : form_graphics.fd.
>
> Someone knows the story on this?
Well this is doomed to vanish as soon as we have a working InsetGraphics,
for which the form_g
...in forms/form1.fd (and src/form1.[Ch]) is a "figure" dialog which appears
to be already in frontends : form_graphics.fd.
Someone knows the story on this?
gr.ed.
15 matches
Mail list logo
