Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009 schrieb José Matos:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 11:50:47 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Is it ok to commit (trunk only)?
>
> The code is compatible with the previous version so I don't see why not. :-)
>
> > I already adapted the cmake build to this new parameter (but not commited
On Sunday 10 May 2009 11:50:47 Kornel Benko wrote:
> Is it ok to commit (trunk only)?
The code is compatible with the previous version so I don't see why not. :-)
> I already adapted the cmake build to this new parameter (but not commited
> yet). It will help to not exceed the command line length
Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb José Matos:
> > Like the following patch (untested)?
>
> Test was ok with the option -s.
>
> But I was unable to find out how to use --src_file.
>
> Kornel
The test is valid now for "--src_file" too. This lyx_pot.p
Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb José Matos:
> Like the following patch (untested)?
Test was ok with the option -s.
But I was unable to find out how to use --src_file.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb José Matos:
..
> > Hi José
> > I prefer an extra parameter like
> > src_files=
> > to the perl script. If there is no such parameter, then proceed as
> > before. So we don't have a need to change every tool which uses this
> > python script.
>
> Like the followi
On Saturday 09 May 2009 07:13:51 Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Hi José
> I prefer an extra parameter like
> src_files=
> to the perl script. If there is no such parameter, then proceed as before.
> So we don't have a need to change every tool which uses this python script.
Like the following patch
Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko:
...
> to the perl script. If there is
...
I meant python of course
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Am Samstag 09 Mai 2009 schrieb José Matos:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 20:12:39 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Thanks Jose, I also found the place we the files should be read, but I
> > don't know python ;)
> >
> > > You get the name of the file in args and then you need to read the file
> > > names from th
On Thursday 07 May 2009 20:12:39 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> Thanks Jose, I also found the place we the files should be read, but I
> don't know python ;)
>
> > You get the name of the file in args and then you need to read the file
> > names from there.
> >
> > input_files = []
> > for l in open(args[
José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 19:11:50 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> OK, I feared it.
>>
>> Peter
>
> FWIW the change is really minimal and it is confined to the last chunk.
>
> if __name__ == '__main__':
>
Thanks Jose, I also found the place we the files should be read, but I don't
know
On Thursday 07 May 2009 19:11:50 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> OK, I feared it.
>
> Peter
FWIW the change is really minimal and it is confined to the last chunk.
if __name__ == '__main__':
You get the name of the file in args and then you need to read the file names
from there.
input_files = []
for l
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-05-03, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Is it possible to call a python file with a file instead of command
>> line parameters?
>
> Not without a change to the python file or a wrapper.
>
> You can of course define an option that expects a file, reads it and
> puts the conte
On 2009-05-03, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Is it possible to call a python file with a file instead of command
> line parameters?
Not without a change to the python file or a wrapper.
You can of course define an option that expects a file, reads it and
puts the content either in argv or directly in th
Is it possible to call a python file with a file instead of command line
parameters?
lyx_pot.py is called on Windows with too long parameter list.
Instead of calling
pyhton lyx_pot.py ... (line with length > 8000)
we need something like
python the_script_with_parameters.py
or a lyx_pot.py whic
14 matches
Mail list logo
