On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, John Weiss wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:55:48PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
>
> Yup, "prosper.layout" is really a modified version of my old
> "slides.layout". It should be commented as such.
>
> P.S.: Please change all referen
ut:
> > http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/examples/prosper/layouts/prosper-by-Weiss.layout
> >
>
> Aroo? I don't recall making any layout called "prosper".
>
> A CU-thesis one, yes. A resume one, yes. The SliTeX-support one,
> sure.
>
> I'l
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:57:30AM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> > not distribute this?
>
> And also another from John Weiss.
> C
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:51:14PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Quoting myself: "... Weiss's layout seems to work best at the moment."
>
> That probably refers to this layout:
> http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/examples/prosper/layouts/prosper-by-Weiss.layout
>
Aroo? I don't rec
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Uh.. I get "syntax error" on the sentence above, but I don't think I've
>
> How many should we tell you to upgrade your compiler? ;-)
This one is internal unfortunately :-)
> Would it be too difficult to put there just a link?
> Please. :-)
I m
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 12:47, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> >
> > And also another from John Weiss.
> > Christian some more bits about this soomewhere in the wiki.
>
> Uh.. I get "syntax error" on the sentence above, but I don't think I've
How many should we tell you to upgrade your c
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we
> > do not distribute this?
>
> There is also one from John Weiss. I don't think anyone's taken the
> time to ascertain why
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> > not distribute this?
>
> And also another from John Weiss.
> Christian some more bits
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we
> do not distribute this?
There is also one from John Weiss. I don't think anyone's taken the
time to ascertain why one and not the other, although I understand
that Christian has us
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> not distribute this?
And also another from John Weiss.
Christian some more bits about this soomewhere in the wiki.
I also intend to polish it and put
There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
not distribute this?
Andre;
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
11 matches
Mail list logo
