On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I do not know what variable would be more suitable, though.
>
> We could of course have a special LYX_CXXFLAGS and add that to
> AM_CXXFLAGS in common.am.
I think this may make sense. I seem to remember running into this
pro
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We could of course have a special LYX_CXXFLAGS and add that to
> AM_CXXFLAGS in common.am.
That makes a lot of sense. LYX_CXXFLAGS to contain things that are
absolutely needed. CXXFLAGS to contain some default but to be over-ridable
by personal tweaks.
--
Angus
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> | CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m'
>
| Lars> so if you change the default you are on your own. I have no idea
| Lars> what you have stumbled into
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m'
Lars> so if you change the default you are on your own. I have no idea
Lars> what you have stumbled into: compiler bug, boost bug, linker
Lars> bug, lyx bug...
La
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (what version of the compiler was this again?)
>>
>
| gcc version 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)
| with a SuSE 9.2 distro
I bet it is the gcc that has problems. Is that the most up to date
compiler for that distro?
--
Lgb
> >> ... why do you play with optimization then?
> >>
> | because 'configure',...tells me
> | that I can do so
>
> But not that it will work...
>
This is getting too semantic for me :-)
Anyway, in my rather long history of
./configure -abc -xyz
make
make install
this is the 1st time I'm broken
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> ... why do you play with optimization then?
>>
| because 'configure', which comes with
| ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.3.5.tar.bz2
| allows for ./configure --help, which tells me
| that I can do s
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... why do you play with optimization then?
>
because 'configure', which comes with
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.3.5.tar.bz2
allows for ./configure --help, which tells me
that I can do so
Thank you,
wolfram
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
| cmon, this is really pushing me to my limits
| - you guys are supposed to be the gurus on
| lyx development - I'm just a poor user ...
If just a poor user... why do you play with optimization then?
| anyway I tried to cope with your suggestion as follo
> Given that your original posting contains only these two messages,
> repeated several times:
>
> undefined reference to
> `void boost::io::detail::(anonymous
> namespace)::empty_buf,
> char>(std::basic_ostringstream char_traits, std::allocator >&)::emptyStr'
>
> `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5boost9re
wolfram wrote:
> A second glance at the link-problem I had yesterday shows that
> it is related to the compiler switches I give to './configure':
>
> with:
> CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m'
>
> or:
> --enable-optimization=O3 CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-
A second glance at the link-problem I had yesterday shows that
it is related to the compiler switches I give to './configure':
with:
CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m'
or:
--enable-optimization=O3 CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3
-march=pentium4m'
compilati
wolfram wrote:
> my distro: SuSE 9.2
I use that too without any problems. I could create an rpm for 1.3.5 if we
don't have one already.
Georg
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What compiler are you using and what machine/OS/distribution?
>
> Angus
>
-
my version of gcc
> temporary/lyx-1.3.5> gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.4/specs
Configured with: ../co
wolfram wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when I try to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably a the very last
> link stage) I get the error attached below.
> It seems as if something from the boost lib is missing, but
> I have a fresh version installed.
> Any help would be appreciated.
> Thanks.
> wolfram
What comp
Hello,
when I try to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably a the very last
link stage) I get the error attached below.
It seems as if something from the boost lib is missing, but
I have a fresh version installed.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
wolfram
CutAndPaste.o(.text+0x11): In function `__t
hi..
i get this error ,compiling lyx-1.1.6fix2 on redhat7.1:
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/lyx/lyx-1.1.6fix2/lib'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `lyxrc.defaults', needed by `all-am'.
Stop.make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/lyx/lyx-1.1.6fix2/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1
17 matches
Mail list logo