Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I do not know what variable would be more suitable, though. > > We could of course have a special LYX_CXXFLAGS and add that to > AM_CXXFLAGS in common.am. I think this may make sense. I seem to remember running into this pro

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > We could of course have a special LYX_CXXFLAGS and add that to > AM_CXXFLAGS in common.am. That makes a lot of sense. LYX_CXXFLAGS to contain things that are absolutely needed. CXXFLAGS to contain some default but to be over-ridable by personal tweaks. -- Angus

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> | CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' > | Lars> so if you change the default you are on your own. I have no idea | Lars> what you have stumbled into

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' Lars> so if you change the default you are on your own. I have no idea Lars> what you have stumbled into: compiler bug, boost bug, linker Lars> bug, lyx bug... La

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (what version of the compiler was this again?) >> > | gcc version 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809) | with a SuSE 9.2 distro I bet it is the gcc that has problems. Is that the most up to date compiler for that distro? -- Lgb

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread wolfram
> >> ... why do you play with optimization then? > >> > | because 'configure',...tells me > | that I can do so > > But not that it will work... > This is getting too semantic for me :-) Anyway, in my rather long history of ./configure -abc -xyz make make install this is the 1st time I'm broken

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> ... why do you play with optimization then? >> | because 'configure', which comes with | ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.3.5.tar.bz2 | allows for ./configure --help, which tells me | that I can do s

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread wolfram
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... why do you play with optimization then? > because 'configure', which comes with ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.3.5.tar.bz2 allows for ./configure --help, which tells me that I can do so Thank you, wolfram

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > | cmon, this is really pushing me to my limits | - you guys are supposed to be the gurus on | lyx development - I'm just a poor user ... If just a poor user... why do you play with optimization then? | anyway I tried to cope with your suggestion as follo

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread wolfram
> Given that your original posting contains only these two messages, > repeated several times: > > undefined reference to > `void boost::io::detail::(anonymous > namespace)::empty_buf, > char>(std::basic_ostringstream char_traits, std::allocator >&)::emptyStr' > > `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5boost9re

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-03 Thread Angus Leeming
wolfram wrote: > A second glance at the link-problem I had yesterday shows that > it is related to the compiler switches I give to './configure': > > with: > CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' > > or: > --enable-optimization=O3 CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-02 Thread wolfram
A second glance at the link-problem I had yesterday shows that it is related to the compiler switches I give to './configure': with: CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' or: --enable-optimization=O3 CXXFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' CFLAGS='-O3 -march=pentium4m' compilati

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-02 Thread Georg Baum
wolfram wrote: > my distro: SuSE 9.2 I use that too without any problems. I could create an rpm for 1.3.5 if we don't have one already. Georg

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-02 Thread wolfram
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What compiler are you using and what machine/OS/distribution? > > Angus > - my version of gcc > temporary/lyx-1.3.5> gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.4/specs Configured with: ../co

Re: link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-02 Thread Angus Leeming
wolfram wrote: > Hello, > > when I try to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably a the very last > link stage) I get the error attached below. > It seems as if something from the boost lib is missing, but > I have a fresh version installed. > Any help would be appreciated. > Thanks. > wolfram What comp

link problem in compiling lyx-1.3.5

2005-05-02 Thread wolfram
Hello, when I try to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably a the very last link stage) I get the error attached below. It seems as if something from the boost lib is missing, but I have a fresh version installed. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. wolfram CutAndPaste.o(.text+0x11): In function `__t

problem in compiling

2001-07-22 Thread lyxteam
hi.. i get this error ,compiling lyx-1.1.6fix2 on redhat7.1: make[2]: Entering directory `/root/lyx/lyx-1.1.6fix2/lib' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `lyxrc.defaults', needed by `all-am'. Stop.make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/lyx/lyx-1.1.6fix2/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1