Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 um 17:02:42, schrieb Richard Heck
>
>>
>> Maybe a simple solution would be to add something into CMakeLists.txt
>> that would strip all the "\r" before sending the files through gettext.
>
> Maybe, see my other mail. But I prefer the solution w
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 11:36 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Am 07.04.2016 um 23:37 schrieb Richard Heck:
>>
>>> Then maybe the solution is to disable the writing of native line
>>> endings. Apparently, we can do this by opening the output files in
>>> binary mode. The attached patch does thi
Richard Heck wrote:
> No, it's bad. I'm faikrly sure there should be almost no difference
> between the files if it is working correctly. Something has happend
> involving this sort of thing:
>
> -#: src/frontends/qt4/ui/WrapUi.ui:173 src/frontends/qt4/GuiParagraph.cpp:163
> +#: src/frontends/qt4/
On 04/09/2016 11:36 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 07.04.2016 um 23:37 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> Then maybe the solution is to disable the writing of native line
>> endings. Apparently, we can do this by opening the output files in
>> binary mode. The attached patch does this. Can someone test?
>
> Thi
Richard Heck wrote:
> The attached patch does this. Can someone test?
More precisely, Uwe could you remerge strings using this patch on clean master
and give us single sample .po file so we can check it is identical when we
remerge it on linux machines?
Pavel
On 04/07/2016 05:21 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> I think the problem may not be that gettext works differently but,
>> perhaps, that it works the same. I am guessing that what happens is this.
>> First, lyx_pot.py writes the po files with native line endings.
> Yep, that might e
Richard Heck wrote:
> I think the problem may not be that gettext works differently but,
> perhaps, that it works the same. I am guessing that what happens is
> this. First, lyx_pot.py writes the po files with native line endings.
Yep, that might explain the original problem, why line wrapping is
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 um 17:02:42, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/07/2016 04:26 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Richard Heck wrote:
> >> Using autotools, this is done via the msguniq program. I cannot tell how
> >> it is done with cmake, but I suspect that this is where the error
> >> occurs, and
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2016 um 13:26:05, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > Using autotools, this is done via the msguniq program. I cannot tell how
> > it is done with cmake,
It is the same with cmake.
po/lyx_pot.py -> *_l10n.pot
po/cat.py: *_l10n.pot -> lyx.cat_tmp.pot
po/dos2un
On 04/07/2016 04:26 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Using autotools, this is done via the msguniq program. I cannot tell how
>> it is done with cmake, but I suspect that this is where the error
>> occurs, and that this is why you get "\r" in the middle of some lines,
>> namely, we g
Richard Heck wrote:
> Using autotools, this is done via the msguniq program. I cannot tell how
> it is done with cmake, but I suspect that this is where the error
> occurs, and that this is why you get "\r" in the middle of some lines,
> namely, we get:
Then we are back at the old problem we were
On 04/07/2016 03:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Georg Baum wrote:
python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO.
>>> Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent to
>>> po-upda...@lyx.org and care for them
Georg Baum wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Georg Baum wrote:
> >> python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO.
> >
> > Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent
> > to po-upda...@lyx.org and care for them in the long term fashion...
> > Pavel
>
Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2016 um 23:58:20, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
>
> Yes, this was me.
> as described in our file README.localization I did:
>
> "
> - on Windows: either build the up
Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
Yes, this was me.
as described in our file README.localization I did:
"
- on Windows: either build the update-po target in MSVC
or run the command: msbuild po\update-p
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO.
>
> Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent
> to po-upda...@lyx.org and care for them in the long term fashion...
> Pavel
Yes, fixing the python script wou
Georg Baum wrote:
> python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO.
Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent
to po-upda...@lyx.org and care for them in the long term fashion...
Pavel
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:08:35PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Nice article. So for us it would suffice to create '.gitattributes' file
> > with the content: *.po text
>
> I fixed the .po files with some sed magic now (like I did already in
> november).
Thanks for doing
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Nice article. So for us it would suffice to create '.gitattributes' file
> with the content: *.po text
Almost. The last time I investigated this I was about to add the attached
one, but it is not enough. Not only the line ends of the files are broken,
but they do contain a
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 10:27:55, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/05/2016 06:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 11:45:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >
> >> Le 05/04/2016 11:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> You mean by using a .gitattributes file?
> >>> Yes, but
On 04/05/2016 06:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 11:45:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> Le 05/04/2016 11:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
You mean by using a .gitattributes file?
>>> Yes, but maybe there are better possibilities.
>>> I checked that we do not have lo
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 11:45:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/04/2016 11:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> You mean by using a .gitattributes file?
> >
> > Yes, but maybe there are better possibilities.
> > I checked that we do not have local attributes file yet, still the .cpp
> >
Le 05/04/2016 11:10, Kornel Benko a écrit :
You mean by using a .gitattributes file?
Yes, but maybe there are better possibilities.
I checked that we do not have local attributes file yet, still the .cpp sources
are handled correctly.
From what I understand, it would be nice to have a gitat
Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 10:28:29, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 05/04/2016 10:16, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
> > Now the files have a mix of and terminated lines.
> >
> > Could we declare *.po as text files (like *.cp
Le 05/04/2016 10:16, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
Now the files have a mix of and terminated lines.
Could we declare *.po as text files (like *.cpp or *.h)?
You mean by using a .gitattributes file?
JMarc
Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
Now the files have a mix of and terminated lines.
Could we declare *.po as text files (like *.cpp or *.h)?
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
26 matches
Mail list logo