On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it works,
> I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a description
> of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
The 1.2.0 math parser was dropping pairs of
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it
>> works, I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a
>> description of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
Dekel> I already said that the patch works.
That's
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >> [example]
>
> Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
>
> Andre> So
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> [example]
Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
Andre> So it works for me but not for you.
OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dek
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:50:24PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > So it works for me but not for you.
>
> Also works here with the patch.
So this probably could go into 1.2.1. But let Jean-Marc decide.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor d
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > [example]
>
> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
>
> So it works for me but not for you.
Also works here with the patch.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> [example]
Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
So it works for me but not for you.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffer
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Attached.
> The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.2.1cvs reads it as \foo a_1.
I give up. Now it loads properly again and I have _nothing_ changed.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will no
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > So send me a test example please.
>
> Attached.
> The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.2.1cvs reads it as \foo a_1.
Weird. I thought I tried exactly this.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:30:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:30:23PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > I have just checked with latest 1.2.1cvs, and the problem is still there.
>
> So send me a test example please.
>
Attached.
The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:30:23PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I have just checked with latest 1.2.1cvs, and the problem is still there.
So send me a test example please.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:32:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:42:11AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The problem is that when you have for example \foo{a_{1}}, where \foo is
> > a macro that is not handled by LyX. Lyx1.2 will read it as \foo a_{1}
> > which is wrong (o
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:42:11AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The problem is that when you have for example \foo{a_{1}}, where \foo is
> a macro that is not handled by LyX. Lyx1.2 will read it as \foo a_{1}
> which is wrong (only the a is passed to \foo).
This seems to work in 1.3.0cvs...
> I
Am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 14:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: What was worng? I forgot already...
>
> >> I think it was about removing extra {}.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:48:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
> >
> > I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use \binom, I
> > get complaints on the console ab
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: What was worng? I forgot already...
>> I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use
>> \binom, I get complaints on the console about extr
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
>
> I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use \binom, I
> get complaints on the console about extra {} and on screen I have
> extra red braces abround my binomials
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Try the attached and tell me if it works.
>> So? Does it work?
Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
I think it was about removing extra {}. With
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Try the attached and tell me if it works.
>
> So? Does it work?
What was worng? I forgot already...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eithe
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:43:50AM +0200, Ulrich Günther wrote:
>> I would be very glad if there was a temporary patch.
Andre> Try the attached and tell me if it works.
So? Does it work?
JMarc
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:43:50AM +0200, Ulrich Günther wrote:
> I would be very glad if there was a temporary patch.
Try the attached and tell me if it works.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferso
The overset command does not work in lyx-1.2.0.
It requires a {} after overset, however the {} is gone every single time after
saving the document.
Example:
In math mode, with AMS-tex on:
B overset{k_1}{k_{-1}} C
After saving the first {} (around k_1) are gone!
I would be very glad if there
22 matches
Mail list logo
