Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > | [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ? | > | > No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches. | | One a year ? C'mon !! :) Everytime. That is just how it is

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ? > > No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches. One a year ? C'mon !! :) john

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:17:52AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:55:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > > I just tried it out, and it seems to work fine for me. However I am > > really bad at finding problems with stuff like this. > > > > You really need to get othe

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ? No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches. -- Lgb

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-07 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:55:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > I just tried it out, and it seems to work fine for me. However I am > really bad at finding problems with stuff like this. > > You really need to get others than me to test this. John is good and > finding problems... 24 hour

noupdate branch

2003-07-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I just tried it out, and it seems to work fine for me. However I am really bad at finding problems with stuff like this. You really need to get others than me to test this. John is good and finding problems... -- Lgb