Am Samstag, 13. November 2004 13:30 schrieb John Spray:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 19:06 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Is this ok to apply? Do you have better suggestions for the text
viewer and
> > editor? I just added what came to mind (and ignored windows
completely).
>
> If we're nominating text
Am Freitag, 12. November 2004 21:06 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> Why 'gvim' and not 'vim'/'vi'?
Because I was too lazy to check for an xterm, too.
Georg
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 19:06 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Is this ok to apply? Do you have better suggestions for the text viewer and
> editor? I just added what came to mind (and ignored windows completely).
If we're nominating text editors: gedit.
John
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:06:39PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Is this ok to apply? Do you have better suggestions for the text viewer and
> editor? I just added what came to mind (and ignored windows completely).
Why 'gvim' and not 'vim'/'vi'?
Andre'
PS: And 'ed'...
I finally managed to install a current version of tex4ht and could test
OpenOffice.org export. The attached patch adds the necessary format and
converters (also for import via writer2latex).
It adds furthermore a viewer and editor for text files. The latter is needed
since the "open" button of the
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Should we add some more converters?
> For XFig perhaps:
>
> \converter "fig" "eps" "fig2dev -Leps $$i $$o" ""
> \converter "fig" "png" "fig
Should we add some more converters?
For XFig perhaps:
\converter "fig" "eps" "fig2dev -Leps $$i $$o" ""
\converter "fig" "png" "fig2dev -Lpng $$i $$o" ""
\converter "fig" "xpm" "
