On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:09:25PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> You informed be that files specific for a certain operating system (such
>>> as os_win*) can follow the standard conventions for this OS instead of
>>> the LyX conventions. It would be useful to put that in
Andre Poenitz wrote:
You informed be that files specific for a certain operating system (such as
os_win*) can follow the standard conventions for this OS instead of the LyX
conventions. It would be useful to put that in this file as well.
That's what I tried to say with:
+ Note: As an e
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:54:04PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Somewhat less strong wording on "wrong" usage.
>> Add a comment on null pointers.
>> Remove outdated example.
>> Comments?
>
> You informed be that files specific for a certain operating system (such as
> os_w
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Somewhat less strong wording on "wrong" usage.
Add a comment on null pointers.
Remove outdated example.
Comments?
You informed be that files specific for a certain operating system (such
as os_win*) can follow the standard conventions for this OS instead of
the LyX conve
Somewhat less strong wording on "wrong" usage.
Add a comment on null pointers.
Remove outdated example.
Comments?
Andre'
Index: Rules
===
--- Rules (revision 24183)
+++ Rules (working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
-
