Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-22 Thread rgheck
On 03/07/2010 07:48 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/03/2010 2:38 PM, rgheck wrote: > On 03/05/2010 11:43 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > Missing requirements would obviously be better, since then the user > knows what to do. > Thanks Richard. Here's a patch for review. Missing packages that prevent a l

Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-11 Thread Julien Rioux
On 11/03/2010 4:12 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 09/03/2010 14:00, rgheck a écrit : I took a look at it and there are things like \...@expandtwoargs that I do not understand. But Julien, if you are sure you know what you are doing here, it is OK. I can explain that particular line: \...@

Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 09/03/2010 14:00, rgheck a écrit : FYI, I've had a look at this and will make some comments and/or go ahead and commit. But I'm tied up with the Qt 4.6.x crashes at the moment. JMarc, could you have a look at the TeX-related parts of the patch? I took a look at it and there are things like

Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-09 Thread rgheck
On 03/07/2010 07:48 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: On 05/03/2010 2:38 PM, rgheck wrote: > On 03/05/2010 11:43 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > Missing requirements would obviously be better, since then the user > knows what to do. > Thanks Richard. Here's a patch for review. Missing packages that prevent a l

RE: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-09 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> But I'm tied up with the Qt 4.6.x crashes at the moment. Which is a good thing :).. Vincent

Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-07 Thread Julien Rioux
On 05/03/2010 2:38 PM, rgheck wrote: > On 03/05/2010 11:43 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > Missing requirements would obviously be better, since then the user > knows what to do. > Thanks Richard. Here's a patch for review. Missing packages that prevent a layout from being available are listed in tex

Re: meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-05 Thread rgheck
On 03/05/2010 11:43 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: Hi list, This is this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3686 It has been around for a while, and continuously postponed. I would have a hack at this. Here is how I think it can be solved: - configure.py and chkconfig.ltx are altered so that tex

meaningless error message for missing document packages

2010-03-05 Thread Julien Rioux
Hi list, This is this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3686 It has been around for a while, and continuously postponed. I would have a hack at this. Here is how I think it can be solved: - configure.py and chkconfig.ltx are altered so that textclass.lst retains the missing package inform