it is in:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18199
Georg Baum wrote:
Leuven, E. wrote:
while investigating this bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3520
it turned out (thanks to georg for giving me some good hints) that the
"requires" field is ignored for macros
the attached patch
Leuven, E. wrote:
> while investigating this bug:
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3520
>
> it turned out (thanks to georg for giving me some good hints) that the
> "requires" field is ignored for macros
>
> the attached patch fixes the bug for me but, as usual, comments are
> apprec
On Friday 04 May 2007 14:59:08 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> JMarc
+1
--
José Abílio
> "Edwin" == Leuven, E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> while investigating this bug:
Edwin> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3520
Edwin> it turned out (thanks to georg for giving me some good hints)
Edwin> that the "requires" field is ignored for macros
Edwin> the attached patch fi
while investigating this bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3520
it turned out (thanks to georg for giving me some good hints) that the
"requires" field is ignored for macros
the attached patch fixes the bug for me but, as usual, comments are
appreciated...
require.patch
Descriptio
