Am Samstag, 24. Februar 2007 16:12 schrieb Michael Gerz:
> Georg Baum schrieb:
> > No. Can you show me how the code path is? I don't understand it. AFAIK
the
> > only interface between text and math is InsetMathHull (even for
macros).
> > Therefore I don't understand why any other math inset need
Georg Baum schrieb:
No. Can you show me how the code path is? I don't understand it. AFAIK the
only interface between text and math is InsetMathHull (even for macros).
Therefore I don't understand why any other math inset needs a plaintext
method (it is never called in mathed, only from outside).
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:32:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> Georg, it turned out that InsetMathHull is not the only place
> Michael> where plaintext() is needed. Math macros are output in -
> Michael> surprise, su
Michael Gerz wrote:
> Georg,
>
> it turned out that InsetMathHull is not the only place where plaintext()
> is needed. Math macros are output in - surprise, surprise -
> InsetMathDim. Does this make sense to you?
No. Can you show me how the code path is? I don't understand it. AFAIK the
only int
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Georg, it turned out that InsetMathHull is not the only place
Michael> where plaintext() is needed. Math macros are output in -
Michael> surprise, surprise - InsetMathDim. Does this make sense to
Michael> you?
Michael> I am temp
Georg,
it turned out that InsetMathHull is not the only place where plaintext()
is needed. Math macros are output in - surprise, surprise -
InsetMathDim. Does this make sense to you?
I am tempted to commit the following patch (with a slightly improved
plaintext() in InsetMathDim.C).
Any co
