On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > > mathed:
> > > x_1y_2
> >
> > the y is a typo???
>
> No, I can confirm the bug.
>
> I have a work around in my local tree, but the whole business of
> super/subscripts seem
> > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > mathed:
> > x_1y_2
>
> the y is a typo???
No, I can confirm the bug.
I have a work around in my local tree, but the whole business of
super/subscripts seems to need a bit of work...
> x_{1_{2_{3}}}
Did you type th
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Eran Tromer wrote:
> >
> > It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> > mathed:
> > x_1y_2
>
> the y is a typo???
No it's not. I'm writing
x y
1 2
and then I delete the 'y'.
Regards,
Eran Tromer
Eran Tromer wrote:
>
> It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
> mathed:
> x_1y_2
the y is a typo???
> The generated latex code contains "x_{1}_{2}", and so does the saved
> .lyx file.
x_{1_{2_{3}}}
this is my code, same in 1.1.6fix2
> The bug exists in the cu
Hello,
It's possible to create a double subscript by typing the following in
mathed:
x_1y_2
The generated latex code contains "x_{1}_{2}", and so does the saved
.lyx file.
The bug exists in the current 1.2.0cvs, and the double subscript is
displayed just like "x_{12}" but with a some space be
