On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Looks like I have to run 'gperf' on something, but I really don't know on
> waht. Would it hurt if I changed this whole thing to use std::map? It's
> only 250 entries or so after all...
Go ahead.
Alejandro
> fine for me, as this will make it easier to add new symbols. but make
> sure that you will be backwards compatible.
No problem, after removal of a few unused functions we only need the
mappings 'name->symbol/id' and 'symbol/id->name' disguised in form of
latexkey * in_word_set(string const
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Aehm.. how do I add new keywords there?
|
| Looks like I have to run 'gperf' on something, but I really don't know on
| waht. Would it hurt if I changed this whole thing to use std::map? It's
| only 250 entries or so after all...
fine for me, as this
Aehm.. how do I add new keywords there?
Looks like I have to run 'gperf' on something, but I really don't know on
waht. Would it hurt if I changed this whole thing to use std::map? It's
only 250 entries or so after all...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [E
