On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> However, in practice, this is unnecessarily complicated. Why
> Michael> don't we have just a "Forward" and a "Backward" button?
>
> That's what we had b
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> However, in practice, this is unnecessarily complicated. Why
Michael> don't we have just a "Forward" and a "Backward" button?
That's what we had before the dialog got redesigned.
JMarc
Michael Gerz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Quoting Michael Gerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Other candidates for the docking:
- The find&replace dialog
- The spellchecker dialog
Those two are _very_ user-unfriendly; for example, you often have to
move them arou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Quoting Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Other candidates for the docking:
- The find&replace dialog
- The spellchecker dialog
Those two are _very_ user-unfriendly; for example, you often have to
move them around to see the text u
Quoting Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
> > Other candidates for the docking:
> > - The find&replace dialog
> > - The spellchecker dialog
> >
> > Those two are _very_ user-unfriendly; for example, you often have to
> > move them around to see the text underneath.
> a
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Other candidates for the docking:
- The find&replace dialog
- The spellchecker dialog
Those two are _very_ user-unfriendly; for example, you often have to
move them around to see the text underneath.
and you often have to restart from top of the document, because ther
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Exactly. That's why QDockWidget is perfect here: it allows both
> behaviour. That's why I recommnend to convert those dialogs to it.
And in Qt 4.3 they are even "tabbable"...
Andre'
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I see that when I detach a dock, after closing and reopening it, it comes
back as dialog. So, it should not be so difficult to add a preference flag
for opening something either as a dock or as a dialog
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> You are of course free to detach and use them as dialogs.
> >
> > That's why I say they are annoying, as I have to do that all
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
Thanks g
On Mar 25, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
Bennett> Perhaps this is another candidate for a "Drawer" on Mac (as
Bennett> with TOC)?
Yes, bu
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:47:25AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>> see attached.
> >>>
> >>> opinions?
> >> I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
> >
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
Thanks god... ;-)
I like it and I guess it's one of the most wanted feature.
This is a personal pr
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > see attached.
> >
> > opinions?
>
> I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
Thanks god... ;-)
> I like it and I guess it's one of the most wanted feature.
This is a personal preference per
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> see attached.
>>
>> opinions?
Bennett> Perhaps this is another candidate for a "Drawer" on Mac (as
Bennett> with TOC)?
Yes, but we have to understand how to docks can live to
On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
Perhaps this is another candidate for a "Drawer" on Mac (as with TOC)?
Bennett
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
I guess it's one of the most wanted feature.
thought it might be
Some
adjustment might be needed though for a maximum user feeling. Ex:
- Replace the function list with a combo.
was thinking of putting a listwidge
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
I like it and I guess it's one of the most wanted feature. Some
adjustment might be needed though for a maximum user feeling. Ex:
- Replace the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
I like it and I guess it's one of the most wanted feature. Some
adjustment might be needed though for a maximum user feeling. Ex:
- Replace the function list with a combo
Edwin Leuven wrote:
see attached.
opinions?
I've resisted the temptation to do it up to now ;-)
I like it and I guess it's one of the most wanted feature. Some
adjustment might be needed though for a maximum user feeling. Ex:
- Replace the function list with a combo.
- Redimension the number
20 matches
Mail list logo
