Re: math bug in cvs

2001-08-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
> (if I understands this correctly)... yes why not. > > ...but to avoid rewriting anything in the parser, output it into a > ostringstream and pass that to the parser just as usual. That would be the simple solution. Indeed. Andre' -- André Pönitz .

Re: math bug in cvs

2001-08-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
> | reading this formula with 1.2.0 gives always the message > | that the file may be corrupted (truncated). > | so far so good, but lyx ignores all the text behind > | this formula. > > so the formula parser does not read (and remove) the \end_inset... It ignores after its own end everything

Re: math bug in cvs

2001-08-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
> sure! but it was lyx which allowed the user to do that! > and btw: it's no problem to run this with latex! means > it's allowed latex stuff ... Ok. I did not know that, so this has to be fixed indeed. > > It would be pretty difficult to parse bad input, given that it's already a > > pain to p

Re: math bug in cvs

2001-08-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > 1.1.6fix3: > > in an equnarray you can delete the lower right cell. > > the formula than looks like > > > > \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*} > > 11 & 21 & 31\\ > > 21 & 22 & 23\\ > > 31 & 32 <- missing cell! > > \end{eqnarray*} > > > > \end_inset > > >

Re: math bug in cvs

2001-08-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
> 1.1.6fix3: > in an equnarray you can delete the lower right cell. > the formula than looks like > > \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*} > 11 & 21 & 31\\ > 21 & 22 & 23\\ > 31 & 32 <- missing cell! > \end{eqnarray*} > > \end_inset > > in 1.1.6 this doesn't matter, the lyxfile i

math bug in cvs

2001-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
1.1.6fix3: in an equnarray you can delete the lower right cell. the formula than looks like \begin_inset Formula \begin{eqnarray*} 11 & 21 & 31\\ 21 & 22 & 23\\ 31 & 32 <- missing cell! \end{eqnarray*} \end_inset in 1.1.6 this doesn't matter, the lyxfile is always read well. readi