Re: master/child assertion

2016-10-18 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:20:04AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > I have no crash either. Thank you for trying. I cannot reproduce this with the above recipe either now. I found a SIGSEGV that I don't know if it is related. I will report that (in a different thread). Scott signature.asc Descript

Re: master/child assertion

2016-10-18 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2016 um 19:11:42, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:12:52PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 10/18/2016 05:20 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:18:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > >> Richard, I just wanted to make

Re: master/child assertion

2016-10-18 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 06:12:52PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/18/2016 05:20 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:18:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > >> Richard, I just wanted to make sure you saw this email. Don't worry of > >> course if you don't have enough ti

Re: master/child assertion

2016-10-18 Thread Richard Heck
On 10/18/2016 05:20 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:18:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> Richard, I just wanted to make sure you saw this email. Don't worry of >> course if you don't have enough time to take a look. To reproduce, you >> do not need to have the XeTeX bi

Re: master/child assertion

2016-10-18 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:18:22PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Richard, I just wanted to make sure you saw this email. Don't worry of > course if you don't have enough time to take a look. To reproduce, you > do not need to have the XeTeX binaries. You can do the following: > > 1. open lib/ex

Re: master/child assertion

2016-09-18 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:48:43PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:46:41PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > On 09/05/2016 12:16 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > On Saturday, September 3, 2016 10:50:49 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> Can anyone else reproduce? > > >>

Re: master/child assertion

2016-09-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:46:41PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 09/05/2016 12:16 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Saturday, September 3, 2016 10:50:49 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> Can anyone else reproduce? > >> > >> Scott > > Using 2.2.1 in Fedora I get > > > > lassert.cpp (51): ASSER

Re: master/child assertion

2016-09-05 Thread Richard Heck
On 09/05/2016 12:16 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Saturday, September 3, 2016 10:50:49 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Can anyone else reproduce? >> >> Scott > Using 2.2.1 in Fedora I get > > lassert.cpp (51): ASSERTION d->clone_list_->empty() VIOLATED IN Buffer.cpp:505 > ( 1) lyx: lyx(+0x7c

Re: master/child assertion

2016-09-05 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:16:35PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Saturday, September 3, 2016 10:50:49 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Can anyone else reproduce? > > > > Scott > > Using 2.2.1 in Fedora I get > > lassert.cpp (51): ASSERTION d->clone_list_->empty() VIOLATED IN Buffer.

Re: master/child assertion

2016-09-05 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 10:50:49 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Can anyone else reproduce? > > Scott Using 2.2.1 in Fedora I get lassert.cpp (51): ASSERTION d->clone_list_->empty() VIOLATED IN Buffer.cpp:505 ( 1) lyx: lyx(+0x7c50eb) [0x55ebc487c0eb] ( 2) lyx: lyx(+0x197894) [0x55ebc

master/child assertion

2016-09-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
To reproduce, open lib/examples/fr/beamer-article.lyx, then right-click on the include inset and go to "edit included file". Then preview with XeTeX. I can reproduce back to at least 2.2.0. I get the following: support/lassert.cpp (51): ASSERTION d->clone_list_->empty() VIOLATED IN /home/scott/