Pavel Sanda writes:
> ok i changed it to the real number with not problematic binary expansion
> after decimal point.
Clever.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Testing the exact representation of a real number is asking for this
> kind of instability. If we were testing a conversion with a given (not
> too large) precision, that would be OK.
>
> I am not sure what to do, besides dropping the test.
ok i changed it to the rea
Pavel Sanda writes:
>> I think this test is wrong. I am not sure how to make such a thing
>> work...
>
> hmm i thought this test means that there was a day when
> convert(1.1) actually returned 1.1 and this test just shows
> there was some change underneath...
>
> i'm not sure whether we handle fo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > make check now fails for lyx-1.6.
> > test_convert now returns
> > 1.1001 instead of 1.1 for convert(1.1)
> >
> > what should be the correct return?
>
> I think this test is wrong. I am not sure how to make such a th
Pavel Sanda writes:
> hi,
>
> make check now fails for lyx-1.6.
> test_convert now returns
> 1.1001 instead of 1.1 for convert(1.1)
>
> what should be the correct return?
I think this test is wrong. I am not sure how to make such a thing
work...
JMarc
hi,
make check now fails for lyx-1.6.
test_convert now returns
1.1001 instead of 1.1 for convert(1.1)
what should be the correct return?
pavel
