Re: lyxerr etc

2007-04-06 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:32:02PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > What do I need to #include to get things like: > lyxerr[DEBUG::gui] << > to work? debug.h Note that the latest fashion is LYXERR(DEBUG::gui) Andre'

Re: lyxerr etc

2007-04-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What do I need to #include to get things like: > lyxerr[DEBUG::gui] << > to work? You need debug.h and you should type LYXERR(DEBUG::gui) << LYXERR is a macro that expands to: if (!lyx::lyxerr.debugging(type)) { } else lyx::lyxerr

Re: lyxerr etc

2007-04-06 Thread Edwin Leuven
Richard Heck wrote: What do I need to #include to get things like: lyxerr[DEBUG::gui] << to work? #include "debug.h" and i think that these days it is lyxerr(DEBUG::gui) <<

lyxerr etc

2007-04-06 Thread Richard Heck
What do I need to #include to get things like: lyxerr[DEBUG::gui] << to work? -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ===