On Tuesday 20 April 2004 09:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> No, we should IMHO try to make lyx2lyx use the same po files as the
> rest of lyx.
>
> So only extraction is needed.
OK. This was already settled after Jean-Marc's message. :-)
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >- Internationalization? There is support inside python to use
>> > gettext, and we can fallback to english if that support is not
>> > present. (A few lines of code, if that matters)
>>
>> Probably useful when warnings and errors are visible in LyX
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Since we will backport the whole dir, and since lyx2yx is
Jose'> stable and we are just polishing the remaining bits give me a
Jose'> notice and in a phew days I will complete the transfer.
Jose'> The delays is just to ensure tha
On Monday 19 April 2004 16:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Go ahead, then (but there is no hurry right now).
Since we will backport the whole dir, and since lyx2yx is stable and
we are just polishing the remaining bits give me a notice and in a phew
days I will complete the transfer.
Th
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> But I would prefer to backport the whole structure as I have
Jose'> confidence in the changes that were made.
Go ahead, then (but there is no hurry right now).
JMarc
On Monday 19 April 2004 15:55, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> The backport of fixes (and especially support for 1.4.0-final
> format). The big patch you just committed looks a bit intimidating
> for 1.3.x, but it is maybe just an impression...
The main areas remained the same only the general s
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do you plan to do wrt 1.3.5cvs?
Jose'> Regarding the internationalization or the backport of fixes?
The backport of fixes (and especially support for 1.4.0-final format).
The big patch you just committed looks a bit intimidating
On Monday 19 April 2004 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If you do that, the strings should go in the already existing lyx po
> files.
OK. :-)
> What do you plan to do wrt 1.3.5cvs?
Regarding the internationalization or the backport of fixes?
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a
On Sunday 18 April 2004 13:48, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> lyx2lyx -t 221 still does not work, because it calls lyx_1_3.py. I
> think the following fixes it, but I am not sure wether it works in
> all cases:
>
> diff -u -p -r1.20 parser_tools.py
> --- lib/lyx2lyx/parser_tools.py 2004/04/14 08:45:46 1.2
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > - Internationalization? There is support inside python to use >
>> gettext, and we can fallback to english if that support is not >
>> present. (A few lines of code, if that matters)
>>
>> Probably useful when warnings and errors are v
On Monday 19 April 2004 12:46, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> > > So far I have not been able to break it ;-)
>
> But I have :-(
Yes, but that was an older bug, so not my doing. ;-)
I checked also that this operator += not support
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:20:54PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> > So far I have not been able to break it ;-)
But I have :-(
The attached seems to be necessary.
- Martin
Index: lyx_1_4.py
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot
Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 12:01 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> The big changes were comited. Now is the right time make a short summary
> of what has been done and what remains. Your feedback is welcome. :-)
lyx2lyx -t 221 still does not work, because it calls lyx_1_3.py. I think the
following fixes i
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 21:03, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 12:01 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> > The big changes were comited. Now is the right time make a short
> > summary of what has been done and what remains. Your feedback is
> > welcome. :-)
>
> So far I have not been able to
Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2004 12:01 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> The big changes were comited. Now is the right time make a short summary
> of what has been done and what remains. Your feedback is welcome. :-)
So far I have not been able to break it ;-)
> - There is the possibility to redirect the
The big changes were comited. Now is the right time make a short summary
of what has been done and what remains. Your feedback is welcome. :-)
Changes:
***
- The code is cleaner.
+ The code for convert and revert is placed together.
+ Follow the same s
16 matches
Mail list logo
