On Monday 10 April 2006 17:26, Georg Baum wrote:
> So basically you are saying that the range->xrange change you asked me to
> do was wrong? I will never do what you are telling me anymore ;-)
This question come recently to comp.lang.python:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.general/4
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:49, Georg Baum wrote:
> 2.3, if you ask me. It is even in Debian stable which is not known to be
> the most up to date distro.
Fair enough.
That is my feeling as well. I will wait probably a little longer but soon I
will start introducing some features only present
On Monday 10 April 2006 17:19, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose'> I propose to apply this patch to 1.4.1 since range and xrange
> Jose'> return the same type, and it should not hurt anyway.
> Jose'> Nevertheless I would like to ask othe
Jose' Matos wrote:
> So the question is, what should be our minimum requirement for 1.5,
> python
> 2.2 or python 2.3?
2.3, if you ask me. It is even in Debian stable which is not known to be the
most up to date distro.
Georg
On Monday 10 April 2006 17:26, Georg Baum wrote:
> So basically you are saying that the range->xrange change you asked me to
> do was wrong? I will never do what you are telling me anymore ;-)
More or less.
As all optimization this is weird. Go to lyx_1_4.py and replace all versions
of range
Jose' Matos wrote:
> The difference between 1.4.1 and 1.5.0svn is:
> Index: parser_tools.py
> ===
> --- parser_tools.py (revision 13616)
> +++ parser_tools.py (working copy)
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> def find_tokens(lines, tokens
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> I propose to apply this patch to 1.4.1 since range and xrange
Jose'> return the same type, and it should not hurt anyway.
Jose'> Nevertheless I would like to ask other people to repeat the
Jose'> same tests and report the results.
I
While testing bug 2501 I decide to load Chris' lyx-docbook file. LyX froze
while the document was loaded.
I thought that lyx2lyx had entered an infinite cycle. That was not true.
# For 1.5 after revision 13625.
$ time ./lyx2lyx ~/tmp/mySGML.lyx > ~/tmp/2501-new.lyx
real0m6.148s
user0
