On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And are you able to reproduce it on your own? Could you tell me what I
> should do to reproduce it?
Scroll down by pressing (no left/right), press C-S-m, type
\demo
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order t
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:45:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Does this mean that you cannot see anymore cursor jumping when
>> inserting a superscript or a fraction?
Andre> I cannot see it on the test case.
And
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:45:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Does this mean that you cannot see anymore cursor jumping when
> inserting a superscript or a fraction?
I cannot see it on the test case.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not ha
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:38:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can
Andre> tell. The first part is not fixed, but not excctly critical.
>> First part of what? Second te
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:38:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can tell. The
> Andre> first part is not fixed, but not excctly critical.
>
> First part of what? Second testcase?
The "misdrawn" pink frame part after typing \demo.
I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:58:06AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> > Excellent. What is the bug number?
>>
>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511
Andre> The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can tell. The
Andre> fi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:17:15PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can tell.
> > The first part is not fixed, but not excctly critical.
>
> Last I chcked it seemed fix in 1.3. Are you saying it's not ?
I am saying I see the first part in 1.2.1cvs.
A
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:07:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:58:06AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > > Excellent. What is the bug number?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511
>
> The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can tell.
> The first pa
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 11:58:06AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Excellent. What is the bug number?
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511
The second part is fixed in 1.2.1cvs as far as I can tell.
The first part is not fixed, but not excctly critical.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to gi
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:44:19AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Two reliable ones in the bug, but I haven't checked 1.2.1
>
> Excellent. What is the bug number?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims."
- Arist
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 04:44:09PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> formulabase.C: In member function `virtual UpdatableInset::RESULT
>InsetFormulaBase::localDispatch(BufferView*, kb_action, const
>std::string&)':
> formulabase.C:782: parse error before `(' token
Argh... this happens if you h
latest cvs, g++ 3.1
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../../boost -isystem
/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -finline-limit=500 -fno-exceptions -W -Wall
-Winline -Winline -c formulabase.C -MT formulabase.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/formulabase.TPlo
formulabase.C: In member function `virtual Up
12 matches
Mail list logo
