On Wednesday 26 June 2002 2:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:43:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't think so. Which comments aren't you happy with.
>
> The big one in the beginning of GraphicsCacheItem.h.
;-) Should be a little clearer now.
Angus
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:43:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I don't think so. Which comments aren't you happy with.
The big one in the beginning of GraphicsCacheItem.h.
> If you aren't interested in such niceties then lose the "connect" step and
> just use
> if (loader.image()->getP
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 7:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:21:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > first shot at preview. It crashes. Don't know why. To see it work a
> > bit, change formula.C:191, to see it crash remove the comment further
> > down.
>
> Act
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:21:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> first shot at preview. It crashes. Don't know why. To see it work a
> bit, change formula.C:191, to see it crash remove the comment further
> down.
Actually I still don't really understand the way the graphics/
