On Wednesday 26 June 2002 6:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:59:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > I have a cached 'BufferView *' already anyway.
> >
> > Which becomes unsafe as soon as we start creating and destroying multiple
> > buferviews?
>
> Probably.
>
> > Hence
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:59:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I have a cached 'BufferView *' already anyway.
>
> Which becomes unsafe as soon as we start creating and destroying multiple
> buferviews?
Probably.
> Hence my thoughts on using a signal to invoke the update...
And I still hav
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 5:47 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > See my mail to the lyx-devel list:
> > "Getting rid of BufferView * current_view from InsetGraphics"
> > for some thoughts on getting rid of current_view in such a context.
>
> I have a cached 'BufferView *' already anyway.
Which bec
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:41:23PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> As soon as the formula changes though you should generate a new graphics
> file...
Sure.
Thanks for your help.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 5:47 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> as this tries to copy-construct the Loader member which is
> boost::non_copy_something.
You're just ahead of me that's all.
Why not define
FormulaInset::FormulaInset(FormulaInset: const & other)
: loader(other.loader.filename())
{
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:29:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Each FormulaInset will generate one graphic file I guess, right? One graphic
> file, one grfx::Loader, so yes, I think that you should have a grfx::Loader
> member variable in FormulaInset.
But that's not possible in the presense
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 5:12 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:53:59PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Does this compile?
>
> Not tried but I am sure it does.
>
> I've currently f*ed up my source tree...
Ok, I'll try and replace those auto_ptr<> const pimpl_ instances with
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:53:59PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does this compile?
Not tried but I am sure it does.
I've currently f*ed up my source tree...
And I can't see how to use the loader. Do I have to make a Loader member
for FormulaInset? If so, how does (FormulaInset's) clone work wi
