On Monday 15 December 2003 10:09, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > > In march 2002 (don't know the file format), the units have been renamed
> > > from "c%" to "col%" etc. See:
> > > http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/lengthcommon.C.dif
> > >f? r1 =1.2&r2=1.3 I think lyx2lyx does
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Being absolutely serious here:
> why not remove the lyx2lyx conversion of minipages to the box inset
> between formats 223 and 225 and re-apply the patch to today's
> lyx2lyx, updating the file format at the same time.
This sounds like a good plan to me.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> For the lfun stuff, we really need another lyx2lyx conversion step.
> lyx2lyx converts minipages to boxes between 223 and 225, but
> unfortunately it was possible to produce a minipage inset via
> minibuffer or tex2lyx in file format 225 (and 226) until my patch
> yes
Jose' Matos: wrote
> > See this testfile from Kornel:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=107072337127639&w=2
>
> Let us be a little pragmatic. :-)
> How many people are bitten by that? Could we tell those people to change
> the files by hand?
Perhaps. AFAICS it is sufficient to ma
On Monday 15 December 2003 08:46, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> For the lfun stuff, we really need another lyx2lyx conversion step. lyx2lyx
> converts minipages to boxes between 223 and 225, but unfortunately it was
> possible to produce a minipage inset via minibuffer or tex2lyx in file
> format
Angus Leeming wrote:
> True enough, but please don't apply this patch until lyx2lyx can
> upgrade older files. Kayvan, for example, uses 1.4.x for his daily
> work and he's already having to work around collapseStatus horkage.
I'll apply the gnome/gtk and MINIPAGE_CODE stuff, since this is really
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:08:41PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller spake thusly:
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
> > concerning the two changes in factory.C: Does it still make sense to
> > check for minipages? I think they should be handled completely by
> > lyx2lyx scripts. LFUN_INSET_MINIPAGE should be r
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> concerning the two changes in factory.C: Does it still make sense to
> check for minipages? I think they should be handled completely by
> lyx2lyx scripts. LFUN_INSET_MINIPAGE should be removed, too.
Yes, this makes sense (I left "minipage-insert" for convenience of old us
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Log message:
> > Minipage is no more (long live the box inset)
>
> Hello,
>
> concerning the two changes in factory.C: Does it still make sense to
> check for minipages? I think they should be handled completely by
> lyx2lyx scripts. LFU
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
>Minipage is no more (long live the box inset)
Hello,
concerning the two changes in factory.C: Does it still make sense to
check for minipages? I think they should be handled completely by
lyx2lyx scripts. LFUN_INSET_MINIPAGE should be removed, too.
10 matches
Mail list logo
