Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> The further attached patch seems to solve the issue.
>> Have no pale idea of why, nor of what was the original
>> purpose of the removed code. Just it looked like very
>> strange to me that the removed loop started to push
>> st
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> The further attached patch seems to solve the issue.
> Have no pale idea of why, nor of what was the original
> purpose of the removed code. Just it looked like very
> strange to me that the removed loop started to push
> stuff on the current BufferView cursor, without ca
The further attached patch seems to solve the issue.
Have no pale idea of why, nor of what was the original
purpose of the removed code. Just it looked like very
strange to me that the removed loop started to push
stuff on the current BufferView cursor, without caring
about the actual status/posit
