On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:08:24 -0700, Carl Ollivier-Gooch wrote:
>> > And security/privacy means always security/privacy to be enforced by
>> > default, unless somebody who knows what he is doing decides against
>> > them. (Most commercial Linux distributions entirely would disagree; but
>> > they
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:43:43 + (GMT), Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
> >
> > And security/privacy means always security/privacy to be enforced by
> > default, unless somebody who knows what he is doing decides against
> > them
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:43:43 + (GMT), Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>
> And security/privacy means always security/privacy to be enforced by
> default, unless somebody who knows what he is doing decides against
> them. (Most commercial Linux distribut
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:43:43 + (GMT), Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> Well wouldn't it be easier to specify in the /usr/local/share/lyx/lyxrc
>> file that you want your files in ~/tmp and create a ~/tmp for every user?
>
>It's undocumented, at leas
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well wouldn't it be easier to specify in the /usr/local/share/lyx/lyxrc
> file that you want your files in ~/tmp and create a ~/tmp for every user?
It's undocumented, at least in 1.1.4, but following your suggestion I
found an example into lyxrc.exampl
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> >
> > How would this even be possible ? We are discussing the safety of gettext
> > calls, the only way this could be a problem is if a) someone made LyX su
On 13-Sep-2000 Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>
> This works well, but has a drawback: all files created LyX will be go-rwx,
> even those under the home directory.
Well wouldn't it be easier to specify in the /usr/local/share/lyx/lyxrc
file that you want your files in ~/tmp and create a ~/tmp for
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
> One alternative is install LyX under it's own directory tree by
> configurin it with "--prefix=/usr/local/lyx"
Or perhaps renaming it /usr/local/bin/lyx.bin.
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
Federal University of Pelotas Meteorological Re
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>
> How would this even be possible ? We are discussing the safety of gettext
> calls, the only way this could be a problem is if a) someone made LyX suid
> or b) someone used LyX in a suid app
Or c) user root usin
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2000 12:42:49 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >
> >I thought it was only a problem for suid programs... I would not give
> >LyX such special rights, anyway...
>
> What, if a talented and qualified intrusor would be able to connect the
>
On 13 Sep 2000 12:42:49 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>I thought it was only a problem for suid programs... I would not give
>LyX such special rights, anyway...
What, if a talented and qualified intrusor would be able to connect the
functions to a suid program? This only means that one le
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:55:11 + (GMT), Carlos A M dos Santos wrote:
>Have you patched LyX or any other software to use native catgets? In my
>system (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) I have gettext-0.10.35 installed because it
>is required by GNU make and wget, but LyX is statically linked to the
>include
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 05:15:17AM +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2000 09:00:50 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >| --- po/Makefile.in.in.orig Tue Sep 12 18:57:02 2000
> >| +++ po/Makefile.in.in Tue Sep 12 18:51:04 2000
> >| @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ gnulocaledir = $(prefix)/share/locale
Carlos A M dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Benjamin Karas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Maintained-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David L. Johnson)
| >
| > Maintained-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) and the LyX Team
|([EMA
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> I think the OpenBSD-port should only use the native catgets, because
> this has been security audited and is confirmed to work. GNU gettext
> is messy, has potential security leaks and doesn't fit well into the
> system, IMHO. It might even jeopardize the
On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Benjamin Karas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Maintained-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David L. Johnson)
>
> Maintained-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) and the LyX Team
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In BSD ports, "Maintained-by" means "who maintais
> "Arnd" == Arnd Hanses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arnd> I think the OpenBSD-port should only use the native catgets,
Arnd> because this has been security audited and is confirmed to work.
Arnd> GNU gettext is messy, has potential security leaks and doesn't
Arnd> fit well into the system, IM
On 13 Sep 2000 09:00:50 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| --- po/Makefile.in.in.orig Tue Sep 12 18:57:02 2000
>| +++ po/Makefile.in.inTue Sep 12 18:51:04 2000
>| @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ gnulocaledir = $(prefix)/share/locale
>| gettextsrcdir = $(prefix)/share/gettext/po
>| subdir = po
>|
Benjamin Karas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
|
| I'm working on a port of lyx-1.1.5fix1 to OpenBSD. Everything compiled
| fine, but two Makefiles gave me some trouble doing a fake install. I've
| attached patches for po/Makefile.in.in and intl/Makefile.in. The changes
| shouldn't break
Hello,
I'm working on a port of lyx-1.1.5fix1 to OpenBSD. Everything compiled
fine, but two Makefiles gave me some trouble doing a fake install. I've
attached patches for po/Makefile.in.in and intl/Makefile.in. The changes
shouldn't break anything.
I'm reusing the old DESC and COMMENT files.
20 matches
Mail list logo
