Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jochen" == Jochen Kmietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jochen> patch < pa did work well, LyX 1.0.3 running fine over here in Jochen> the computer center now. Nice. Thanks for reporting these problems, since they could have caused problems. >> Concerning 1.1.x, it is cvs only, so you will

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jochen Kmietsch
Hello again ! On 04-Jun-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote (concerning Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0): > The error was right, there was some wrong function prototypes > around. I append to this message a part of the changes I will soon do Thank you for that. &g

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jochen" == Jochen Kmietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Jochen, in the meantime, you can just delete the offening commands >> (two lyxerr.debug() statements) since they are not important. Tell >> us what happens then. Jochen> It compiled that file ok. I am waiting for the rest right now

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jochen Kmietsch
Hello again ! On 04-Jun-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote (concerning Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0): > I think I'll wait for 1.1.x for that. We do not want to do much > cleanup work on 1.0.x anyway... Is 1.1.x in CVS only or can I get it as a tarball anyw

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jochen" == Jochen Kmietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jochen> Nope, the error about the unresolved symbols remains. This Jochen> was Jochen> Undefined first referenced symbol in file void Jochen> MenuRunChktex(Buffer*) lyxfunc.o void MenuRunLaTeX(Buffer*) Jochen> lyxfunc.o int send_fax(

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Asger Alstrup Nielsen
> Jochen> "../src/lyx_main.C", line 148: Warning (Anachronism): Formal > Jochen> argument 2 of type extern "C" void(*)(int) in call to > Jochen> signal(int, extern "C" void(*)(int)) is being passed > Jochen> void(*)(int). [...] "lyxvc.C", line 337: Warning > Jochen> (Anachronism): Formal argumen

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jochen> "../src/lyx_main.C", line 148: Warning (Anachronism): Formal Jochen> argument 2 of type extern "C" void(*)(int) in call to Jochen> signal(int, extern "C" void(*)(int)) is being passed Jochen> void(*)(int). [...] "lyxvc.C

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> OK, I did not know that a C++ compiler could generate "C" linkage > functions. I thought that it could only use them... Is this supposed > to work everywhere? I don't know. Greets, Asger

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> OK, I did not know that a C++ compiler could generate "C" linkage >> functions. I thought that it could only use them... Is this >> supposed to work everywhere? Asger> I don't know. The C++ FAQ lite suggests to do extern "

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Asger" == Asger Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Asger> Judging from the warning text, it seems we are passing C++ Asger> functions as C functions. I suppose that might not work on Asger> some platforms, so we should define C style linking for those Asger> callback functions.

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It is indeed a bug. Lars, what is the right solution, casting to | long? The correct solution is to use the new debugstream in 1.1.x, but since that will not happen in 1.0.x, use a cast: long(...) Lgb

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-03 Thread Jochen Kmietsch
Hello again ! On 03-Jun-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote (concerning Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0): > Jochen> Hi Folks ! It's me again :) The VSPACE problem does not > Jochen> appear anymore but now I get > OK, One problem solved :) Thanks again f

Re: lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jochen" == Jochen Kmietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jochen> Hi Folks ! It's me again :) The VSPACE problem does not Jochen> appear anymore but now I get OK, One problem solved :) Jochen> CC -c -O -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/local/include Jochen> -I/usr/openwin/include insetlatexaccent

lyx-1.0.3 compile fails on Solaris 2.6 with Sun CC 5.0

1999-06-02 Thread Jochen Kmietsch
Hi Folks ! It's me again :) The VSPACE problem does not appear anymore but now I get CC -c -O -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/local/include-I/usr/openwin/include insetlatexaccent.C "insetlatexaccent.C", line 227: Error: Overloading ambiguity between "operator+(const LString&, const long&)" and