Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Allan Rae
I wish people would trim their reply to lists I keep getting duplicates from a lot of people. Uhhh. On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Arnd Hanses wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:06:39 -0800, Karl Nelson wrote: > > >One last suggestion is to rename sigc++config.h sigc++/config.h > >in all the headers so tha

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 23:06:39 -0800, Karl Nelson wrote: >One last suggestion is to rename sigc++config.h sigc++/config.h >in all the headers so that you don't need to include sigc++ >in your include paths. (and of course make the corresponding >rename in the configure.in.) Hi, once again I'

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Karl Nelson
> Karl, > the sigc++ acconfig.in patch needed to get things to compile correctly on NT, > did that go into CVS? > Allan could you please include that? Yep, the change is in. Since Allan is building from a CVS, it should be in when he builds it with the most recent makeLyx script. --Karl

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Dr. Ing. Roland Krause
Karl, the sigc++ acconfig.in patch needed to get things to compile correctly on NT, did that go into CVS? Allan could you please include that? Background: libsigc++-0.8.6 does not compile out of the box on cygnus-b20 because there are little issues with the configuration. Karl send me a patch th

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Karl Nelson
> > Compile speed and saving a few extra bytes in the distribution. It is > also a heavy handed way of forcing everyone to think carefully about why > they want more than 2 parameters. I have ways of vastly reducing the number of templates involved but they are much to space hungry (involve cha

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-31 Thread Allan Rae
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Karl Nelson wrote: > Okay, I will poke at it a bit. You really don't want to > generate the *.h files in the src_dir though as it can mess some > things up. Not a problem, I will just add $(builddir) to the include > path as well to fix that. You're right. I was in a hurr

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-30 Thread Karl Nelson
> > > > You likely need to add a "-I $(top_srcdir)/sigc++/macros" or something > > to that effect in the Makefile.am. > > That will make m4 find the template.macros.m4 however the bigger problem > is that the generated headers are put into: > obj-libsigc++/sigc++/ > instead of > lib

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-30 Thread Karl Nelson
Okay, I will poke at it a bit. You really don't want to generate the *.h files in the src_dir though as it can mess some things up. Not a problem, I will just add $(builddir) to the include path as well to fix that. BTW, just curious why you are truncating the signal system numbers down? Those

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-30 Thread Allan Rae
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Karl Nelson wrote: > > > > An extremely annoying thing about libsigc++ is that is doesn't support > > VPATH compiles. So it has broken those for LyX unless you use an external > > library. > > Not sure what a VPATH compile is. Care to clue me in? > (I know autoconf well,

Re: libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-30 Thread Karl Nelson
> > An extremely annoying thing about libsigc++ is that is doesn't support > VPATH compiles. So it has broken those for LyX unless you use an external > library. Not sure what a VPATH compile is. Care to clue me in? (I know autoconf well, automake poorly, and rpm/deb not at all.) > So if you

libsigc++ doesn't like VPATH compiles

2000-01-30 Thread Allan Rae
An extremely annoying thing about libsigc++ is that is doesn't support VPATH compiles. So it has broken those for LyX unless you use an external library. So if you try this and it fails don't blame me blame Karl. Then get a cvs copy of libsigc++ and fix it for Karl (and us). We could probably